Abstract
In this essay, I argue that neglect in literacy studies of the early twentieth-century office as a site of women’s literate labor has been reinforced by two commonplaces about clerical work: first, that clerical work was routinized and deskilled after the turn of the century (and, consequently, became “women’s work”), and second, that the labor of writing was split into the “head” work of male executives and the “hand” work of female clerical workers. Focusing on the figure of the early twentieth-century female stenographer, I identify some of the problems with these two commonplaces and urge literacy scholars to recover the labor of clerical workers in their histories. The essay concludes with a brief discussion of the diary of a stenographer named Irene Chapin, who lived and worked in Western Massachusetts in the late 1920s.
- Journal
- Literacy in Composition Studies
- Published
- 2014-03-15
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Citation data not yet available for this article.
Related Articles
-
Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric Feb 2026Danielle Bacibianco
-
Written Communication Feb 2026Jonathan Marine; Jason Grant; Paul Rogers
-
College Composition and Communication Feb 2026Holly Hassel; Kate L. Pantelides
-
Written Communication Jan 2026The Contributions of Student-Level and Classroom-Level Factors for Australian Grade 2 Students’ Writing Performance ↗Anabela Malpique; Mustafa Asil; Deborah Pino-Pasternak; Debora Valcan
-
College Composition and Communication Dec 2025Black Women in the Control Room: Exploring the Sonic Literacies Development of a Hip Hop Audio Engineer ↗Christopher E. Castillo