Taking Shorthand for Literacy: Historicizing the Literate Activity of US Women in the Early Twentieth-Century Office
Abstract
In this essay, I argue that neglect in literacy studies of the early twentieth-century office as a site of women’s literate labor has been reinforced by two commonplaces about clerical work: first, that clerical work was routinized and deskilled after the turn of the century (and, consequently, became “women’s work”), and second, that the labor of writing was split into the “head” work of male executives and the “hand” work of female clerical workers. Focusing on the figure of the early twentieth-century female stenographer, I identify some of the problems with these two commonplaces and urge literacy scholars to recover the labor of clerical workers in their histories. The essay concludes with a brief discussion of the diary of a stenographer named Irene Chapin, who lived and worked in Western Massachusetts in the late 1920s.
- Journal
- Literacy in Composition Studies
- Published
- 2014-03-15
- Topics
Citation Context
Citation data not yet available for this article.
Citation data is not available for Literacy in Composition Studies. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.
Related Articles
-
Literacy in Composition Studies Feb 2026Girdharry, Kristi
-
Written Communication Feb 2026Zhaozhe Wang
-
College Composition and Communication Feb 2026Investigating Undergraduate L2 Students’ Source Use Development in a Semi-Disciplinary Writing Context ↗Soomin Jwa
-
College Composition and Communication Dec 2025Black Women in the Control Room: Exploring the Sonic Literacies Development of a Hip Hop Audio Engineer ↗Christopher E. Castillo
-
Written Communication Oct 2025Ibrar Bhatt; Xiajing Chen