Using the Mother Tongue as a Resource: Building on a Common Ground with "English Only" Ideologies
Abstract
This paper seeks to offer a constructive critique of the idea that in order to align US writing instruction with the learning needs of a globalized, linguistically diverse population, writing studies should challenge the notion that the English language needs to play a central role in college composition courses. I point out rhetorical and pedagogical fallacies in a language rights discourse that warns against “ceding rhetorical ground to monolingual ideologies” (Flowers 33) by affirming writing studies’ commitment to ensuring access to English while promoting linguistic diversity within writing instruction. I then discuss a translingual writing program I started at a Hispanic Serving Institution that links ESL and Spanish writing courses within a learning community. I discuss how the implementation of this program relied on finding a common ground with “English only” ideology and show how this program disrupted “unilateral monolingualism” (Horner and Trimbur 595), in spite of the fact that it foregrounded the need to facilitate English academic literacy acquisition.
- Journal
- Literacy in Composition Studies
- Published
- 2022-11-15
- Topics
Citation Context
Citation data not yet available for this article.
Citation data is not available for Literacy in Composition Studies. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.
Related Articles
-
Teaching English in the Two-Year College May 2022Andrea Parmegiani
-
Written Communication Apr 2021Exploring General Versus Academic English Proficiency as Predictors of Adolescent EFL Essay Writing ↗Claire W. Jo
-
Literacy in Composition Studies May 2018Research, Writing, and Writer/Reader Exigence: Literate Practice as the Overlap of Information Literacy and Writing Studies Threshold Concepts ↗Stinnett, Jerry; Rapchak, Marcia
-
Literacy in Composition Studies Feb 2026Girdharry, Kristi
-
Written Communication Feb 2026Zhaozhe Wang