Abstract
A discontinuity is sometimes claimed to exist between Burke's early literary aesthetics and his later work. I argue for a continuity: already in Counter-Statement (1931), the formal¸ aesthetically powerful properties of literature are among those that, in his later formulations, enable texts to be "equipment for living" and "symbolic action."
- Journal
- KB Journal: The Journal of the Kenneth Burke Society
- Published
- 2017-04
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Citation data not yet available for this article.
Citation data is not available for KB Journal: The Journal of the Kenneth Burke Society. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.
Related Articles
-
Written Communication May 2026Categorizing Human Identity in Writing Research: A Case for Participant Self-Identification in the Disaggregation of Data ↗Jennifer Burke Reifman
-
Res Rhetorica Apr 2026The rhetorical dimension of the justification for the absence of direct military support for Ukraine in Joe Biden’s statements ↗Marta Kobylska
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Mar 2026Miriam F. Williams
-
Computers and Composition Mar 2026Morgan Banville; Leah Heilig; Madison Jones
-
Computers and Composition Mar 2026Shifting rhetorical agency in multimodal UX composition with AI: Sharing rhetorical authority with technologies ↗Nupoor Ranade; Daniel L. Hocutt