Rethinking Regulation in the Age of the Literacy Machine
Abstract
Drawing from a large qualitative study, we examine how students experience writing in college, focusing on the conditions that allow students to develop their authorship and those that encourage students to experience writing as a process of following rules and regulations. We situate students’ perceptions, and the assignments and practices that led to them, within what anthropologists call “audit culture”—accounting practices and their technologies, which have migrated across institutions, including higher education. We suggest our field’s institutional status and pedagogical complexities make us especially susceptible to audit culture, and we argue that students’ experiences in our writing classrooms, where they face an ever-increasing bureaucratization of literacy, is an urgent area of research. We ask readers to consider the extent to which audit culture encourages teachers to create closed systems that privilege outcomes rather than consequences with an end-inview. We conclude by calling for an artisanal identity for both teachers and students.
- Journal
- College Composition and Communication
- Published
- 2016-09-01
- DOI
- 10.58680/ccc201628757
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (2)
-
Mihut (2022)College Composition and Communication
-
Kalish et al. (2019)Pedagogy
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Written Communication Jan 2026Clara Palm; Ann-Christin Randahl; Liss Kerstin Sylvén
-
Journal of Business and Technical Communication Oct 2025Teaching Ethics in Communication and Business Courses: The Use of Standard Versus Virtual Reality Video ↗Steven Bauer; Juanie N. Walker; Sarah Fischbach; Alice Labban
-
College Composition and Communication Sep 2025Using the AI Life Cycle to Unblackbox AI Tools: Teaching Résumé 2.0 with Résumé Analytics and Computational Job-Résumé Matching ↗Huiling Ding
-
Communication Design Quarterly Sep 2025Jacob D. Richter
-
The Peer Review Sep 2025Ana Raquel Fialho Ferreira Campos; João Tiago Gaspar Cozechen; Elaine Pereira Lustosa; Marcos Angel De Carvalho Eing; Leonardo Schimiloski