Local Examples and Master Narratives: Stanley Fish and the Public Appeal of Current-Traditionalism
Abstract
This article analyzes the rhetoric of public attitudes toward composition, as represented in Stanley Fish’s “Think Again” blog in the New York Times and in comments posted by his readers. Fish denounces the field of composition as highly politicized and anti-academic and advocates instead a belletristic, current-traditional approach. The dialogue between Fish and his audience exemplifies the web of definitions and logical fallacies by which current-traditionalism and belletristic English frame public attitudes. To the extent that composition’s “public turn” involves engaging public opinion, compositionists must anticipate this framing or else find their engagements ineffective, even self-defeating.
- Journal
- College Composition and Communication
- Published
- 2015-02-01
- DOI
- 10.58680/ccc201526861
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Sep 2024Joshua Hananmodern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism composition theory genre theory discourse analysis cultural rhetorics argument qualitative research quantitative research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric editorial matter
-
Literacy in Composition Studies Dec 2024Elizabeth Kimball
-
Rhetoric & Public Affairs Sep 2024Arthur E. Walzer
-
Rhetoric & Public Affairs Mar 2023Carly S. Woods
-
Pedagogy Oct 2022William Stroup