Abstract
In this embedded case study of a mid-Atlantic writing center, I interviewed and observed 3 writing center tutors regarding their academic language ideologies and conceptualizations of academic writing. I found that tutors focused on “grammar” when discussing academic language, and tutored in adherence with “rules” they expected professors to enforce. This demonstrated that tutors may hold a standard language ideology regarding academic writing. However, tutors also focused on student voice through style and word choice, and were concerned with overriding student voice through their tutoring practices. Because of these two conceptualizations of professor focused rules and student centered voice, tutors shifted between prioritizing the two in their tutoring sessions. Ultimately, I argue that tutors need to reimagine what it means to “sound academic” for a more linguistically just tutoring praxis.
- Journal
- The Peer Review
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Citation data not yet available for this article.
Citation data is not available for The Peer Review. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.
Related Articles
-
The Peer Review Sep 2025Moving Against the Grain: Combining Writing Center Theory and In-House Editing Services to Create a Graduate Writing Center ↗Brian Harrell; Brook Wyers; Craig Theissen
-
The Peer Review Apr 2025Alexandra Krasova; Mahmoud Othman
-
Writing Center Journal 2025Centering AI Literacy: Exploring Brazilian International Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT and Peer Tutoring ↗Leigh Ann Dunning; Raissa Borges De Oliveira Leal
-
Writing Center Journal 2025Central Habits of Highly Effective Tutors: Hospitable Practice, Rhetorical Listening, and Emotional Validation in the Writing Center ↗Edward A. English
-
Praxis: A Writing Center Journal 2025Mapping It Out: Rhizomatic Learning of Peer Embedded Tutors for Composition Classes – A Case Study ↗Iwona Ionescu