Abstract

Contemporary argument increasingly relies on quantitative information and reasoning, yet our profession neglects to view these means of persuasion as central to rhetorical arts. Such omission ironically serves to privilege quantitative arguments as above “mere rhetoric.” Changes are needed to our textbooks, writing assignments, and instructor development programs to broaden how both we and our students perceive rhetoric.

Journal
College Composition and Communication
Published
2010-02-01
DOI
10.58680/ccc20109956
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (13)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Assessing Writing
  5. Computers and Composition
Show all 13 →
  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Rhetoric Review
  8. Literacy in Composition Studies

References (0)

No references on file for this article.