Abstract

ABSTRACT Taking seriously Kenneth Burke's claim that identification follows property's logic discloses identification's rootedness not only in nonsymbolic motion but also in attitudinal sensation, that midway realm between sheer motion and symbolic action. Burke's key distinction is among three terms, not two—implying consubstantial (not antithetical) relations between pure persuasion and identification. Thus understood, these relations have implications for the New Rhetoric, in particular for how it frames the question of justice.

Journal
Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Published
2013-07-03
DOI
10.1080/15362426.2013.827596
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. Poetic Motive
    Hudson Review  
  2. (Nonsymbolic) Motion/(Symbolic) Action
    Critical Inquiry  
  3. On Persuasion, Identification, and Dialectical Symmetry” [ed. James Zappen]
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  
  4. ‘Pure Persuasion’ and Verbal Irony
    Southern Communication Journal  
  5. Pure Persuasion: A Case Study of Nüshu or ‘Women's Script’ Discourses
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  6. The New Rhetoric and the Rhetoricians: Remembrances and Comments
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  7. The Rhetoric of Prayer and Argument in Anselm
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  
  8. Kenneth Burke: Rhetoric, Subjectivity, Postmodernism
  9. Kenneth Burke on Dialectical-Rhetorical Transcendence
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →