Reasonable and Rational: Renewed Loci for Rhetorical Justice

Philosophy & Rhetoric May 2016

Reasonable and Rational: Renewed Loci for Rhetorical Justice

Don J. Kraemer California State Polytechnic University

Abstract

AbstractWhereas the new rhetoric project associates the rational with the certainty of abstract objectivism, normative philosophy associates the rational with the ethical (the good), that is, the individual's pursuit of a life well lived. Normative philosophy distinguishes the ethical, then, not from the rational but from the moral (the reasonable), which represents the obligations we have toward others to ensure just relations among people. In philosophy, the rational and reasonable function as loci for arguments about values, but their rhetorical resourcefulness is dismissed rather than elaborated by the philosophy reviewed here, which gives the reasonable's abstract objectivity priority over the concrete preferences embodied by the rational. The concrete objectivism so important to the new rhetoric project could be more fully redeemed, I suggest, were the new rhetoric project to transform philosophy's rational-reasonable distinction into two uneasily coexisting, mutually reinforcing loci.

Journal: Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published: 2016-05-15
DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.49.2.0173
Open Access: Closed
Topics: multilingual writers

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Anderson et al. (2020)

Developments in Dissociation: Past Contexts, Present Applications, Future Impli…

Philosophy & Rhetoric

Cites in this index (4)

Crosswhite (2013)

The Rhetorical Unconscious of Argumentation Theory:

Philosophy & Rhetoric
Kraemer (2013)

The Reasonable and the Sensible:

Philosophy & Rhetoric
Kraemer (2008)

“It may seem strange”: Strategic Exclusions in Lincoln's Second Inaugural

Rhetoric Review
Crosswhite (1997)

The Rhetoric of Reason: Writing and the Attractions of Argument

College Composition and Communication

Also cites 14 works outside this index ↓

Burke, Kenneth. 1966. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley: Universi…

↗
Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

↗
Crosswhite, James. 2013a. Deep Rhetoric: Philosophy, Reason, Violence, Justice, Wisdom. Chicago: University o…

↗
Darwall, Stephen. 2013. Morality, Authority, and Law: Essays in Second-Personal Ethics. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxfor…

↗
Delacampagne, Christian. 1999. A History of Philosophy in the Twentieth Century. Trans. M. B. DeBevoise. Balt…

↗
Frank, David A. 2007. “A Traumatic Reading of Twentieth-Century Rhetorical Theory: The Belgian Holocaust, Mal…

↗
Kraemer, Don J. 2013a. “Between Motion and Action: The Dialectical Role of Affective Identification in Burke.…

↗
Larmore, Charles. 2010. “Reflection and Morality.” Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation 27 (2): 1–28.

↗
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University…

↗
Parfit, Derek. 2011. On What Matters. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

↗
Perelman, Chaïm. 1979. The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and Its Applications. Dordrech…

↗
Rawls, John. 2007. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy. Ed. Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, MA: Belkna…

↗
Scanlon, T. M. 1982. “Contractualism and Utilitarianism.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, ed. Amartya Sen and B…

↗
Solomon, Martha. 1988. “‘With firmness in the right’: The Creation of Moral Hegemony in Lincoln's Second Inau…

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →