The Rhetorical Unconscious of Argumentation Theory:

Philosophy & Rhetoric Nov 2013

The Rhetorical Unconscious of Argumentation Theory:

James Crosswhite University of Oregon

Abstract

ABSTRACT The contemporary study of argumentation has produced sophisticated new theories that attempt to capture norms for evaluating arguments that are much more complex and more suited to actual argumentation than the traditional logical standards. The most prominent theories also make explicit attempts to distinguish themselves from rhetorical approaches. Yet, in the case of at least three major systematic theories of argumentation, a reliance on rhetorical theory persists. Despite denials, each account ultimately grounds its norms in considerations of reception and audience. There are good reasons why these theories are attracted to rhetoric, and there are understandable factors that produce their concern about it. Ultimately, though, the rhetorical dimension of these theories is one of their major theoretical virtues and a clear sign of their staying close to the realities of argumentation.

Journal: Philosophy & Rhetoric
Published: 2013-11-01
DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.46.4.0392
Open Access: Closed
Topics: rhetorical theory argument

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Kraemer (2016)

Reasonable and Rational: Renewed Loci for Rhetorical Justice

Philosophy & Rhetoric

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓

Tindale, Christopher. 2006. “Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise.” Argumentation 20 (4…

↗
van Eemeren, Frans H. 2010. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectica…

↗
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectic…

↗
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2000. “Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework…

↗
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 2006. “Strategic Maneuvering: A Synthetic Recapitulation.” Argum…

↗
Walton, Douglas. 1998. The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto…

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →