Abstract

AbstractMust acts of identification via an inclusive “we” mystify the inequalities they are meant to transcend? One answer lies in this essay's reading of Abraham Lincoln's and Kenneth Burke's rhetoric, a reading that tracks (especially through Lincoln's rhetoric) the “ways of identification,” ways which Burke claimed “are in accordance with the nature of property.” Identification in Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address confirms much of Burke's theory, yet Lincoln's career of appeals to the connections between property and propriety—and in particular the specific identifications made by such appeals in the Second Inaugural—suggests that Burke's presentation of identification is itself a kind of mystification that can lead to under-reading the ways of identification.

Journal
Advances in the History of Rhetoric
Published
2009-01-01
DOI
10.1080/15362426.2009.10597379
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method
  2. The Philosophy of Literary Form
  3. “Methodological Repression and/or Strategies of Containment.”
    Critical Inquiry  
  4. Attitudes Toward History.,
  5. This Mighty Scourge: Perspectives on the Civil War
  6. “Kenneth Burke: A Dialogue of Motives.”
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  
  7. The Idea of Identification
  8. “Burkeian and Freudian Theories of Identification.”
    Communication Quarterly  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →