Assessing Writing Jan 2004

Following Phaedrus: Alternate choices in surmounting the reliability/validity dilemma

David H. Slomp ; Jim Fuite
Journal
Assessing Writing
Published
2004-01-01
DOI
10.1016/j.asw.2004.10.001
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Sundeen (2014)
    Instructional rubrics: Effects of presentation options on writing quality
    Assessing Writing
  2. Slomp (2012)
    Challenges in assessing the development of writing ability: Theories, construct…
    Assessing Writing

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Penny et al. (2000)
    The effect of rating augmentation on inter-rater reliability
    Assessing Writing
  2. Wiggins (1994)
    The constant danger of sacrificing validity to reliability: Making writing asse…
    Assessing Writing
  3. Huot (1990)
    Reliability, Validity, and Holistic Scoring: What We Know and What We Need to Know
    College Composition and Communication
Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. Herman (1993)
    Assessing writing portfolios: Issues in the validity and meaning of scores
    Educational Assessment  ↗
  2. Messick (1989)
    Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment
    Educational Researcher  ↗
  3. Moss (1992)
    Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performance…
    Review of Educational Research  ↗
  4. Moss (1994)
    Can there be validity without reliability
    Educational Researcher  ↗
  5. Moss (1995)
    Themes and variations in validity theory
    Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice  ↗
  6. Yancey (1999)
    Looking back as we look forward: Historicizing writing assessment
    College Composition and Communication  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network →