Abstract
Building on mental health rhetoric research (MHRR), I explore how legal advocates in non-profit organizations guide survivors of domestic abuse in obtaining orders for protection (OFPs). State statutes not only dictate what a petition for an OFP must contain, but these statutes and resulting documents also reflect cultural and structural biases about domestic abuse. Through rhetorical analysis of state statutes and personal interviews with legal advocates in this inductive and qualitative study, I discovered that these advocates engage in subversive rhetorical intervention, what the advocates call “crafty” intervention. Such intervention is designed to meet the requirements of state statutes for an OFP and also provide a way for survivors to tell their stories in their own way. This intervention sets the stage for helping survivors heal from the trauma of domestic abuse, convincing judges that survivors need OFPs to stay safe, and demonstrating to state legislators that domestic abuse statutes may be too restrictive.
- Journal
- Rhetoric of Health and Medicine
- Published
- 2024-05-15
- DOI
- 10.5744/rhm.2024.2004
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Topics
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Mar 2026“It's Hard to Show ROI When You’re Preventing Things from Happening”: How Impact Storytelling Frames Community Health Initiatives for Executive Audiences ↗Margaret Hsiao
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Feb 2026Apoorva Bharadwaj
-
Communication Design Quarterly Dec 2025Nadya Shalamova; Gustav Verhulsdonck
-
Composition Forum Oct 2025
-
Written Communication Oct 2025Popularization Writing Skills Development: A Longitudinal Case Study of the Writing Process and Writing Outcomes in Nine Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Students ↗Florentine Marnel Sterk; Merel van Goch; Michael Burke; Iris van der Tuin