Abstract
In this essay I bring together two spaces—street needle exchange and the university classroom—to explore harm reduction as an epistemological model that can be adapted pedagogically in our rhetoric, communications, and composition classes. I first identify capitalism in the classroom as an insistence on mastery and the relentless call to know, acquire, and achieve. I then offer harm reduction, a public health practice that rejects these iterations of capitalism, to instead ask how we might meet students where they are and how we might forego the rewards of telos for the discomfort of process and mess. I’ll argue in this piece that reducing the harms of capitalist-based writing and knowledge requires considered attention to the ways we are lured toward production (what we might even call “deliverables”). I explore the epistemological nodes of harm reduction—its emphasis on temporality and its privileging of process—as methods for teaching writing, rhetoric, and communications while also offering a pedagogical case study along the way.
- Journal
- Rhetoric of Health and Medicine
- Published
- 2022-09-28
- DOI
- 10.5744/rhm.2021.4e1
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Topics
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Written Communication Jan 2026Clara Palm; Ann-Christin Randahl; Liss Kerstin Sylvén
-
Literacy in Composition Studies Feb 2021Composing Literary Arguments in an 11th Grade International Baccalaureate Classroom: How Classroom Instructional Conversations Shape Modes of Participation ↗Newell, George E.; Thanos, Theresa Siemer; Seymour, Matt
-
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jan 2017Jason Chew Kit Tham
-
Research in the Teaching of English Aug 2015Todd DeStigter
-
Research in the Teaching of English Aug 2011Subjectivity, Intentionality, and Manufactured Moves: Teachers’ Perceptions of Voice in the Evaluation of Secondary Students’ Writing ↗Jill V. Jeffery