Abstract

The majority of first-year writing “is taught by teachers whose educational backgrounds are more likely to be in literature, cultural studies, or creative writing than in rhetoric and composition” (Abraham 78). This disciplinary knowledge gap poses a challenge for FYW faculty to adjust to new shifts in FYW pedagogy. We would expect inhouse faculty development opportunities to help fill these gaps; however, the results of our year-long qualitative study indicate that the lack of shared disciplinary knowledge and the constraints on adjunct faculty make it challenging for faculty without backgrounds in writing studies to adapt their pedagogies. We add to the body of scholarship on professionalization in two-year college writing studies (e.g., Andelora; Griffiths; Jensen et al.; Sullivan; Toth et al., “Distinct”) and argue that addressing this problem will require investing resources in adjunct support; changing hiring practices to prioritize expertise in writing studies; and designing faculty development that focuses on both theory and pedagogy.

Journal
Teaching English in the Two-Year College
Published
2024-05-01
DOI
10.58680/tetyc2024514292
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (11)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  5. College Composition and Communication
Show all 11 →
  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. College Composition and Communication
  6. Teaching English in the Two-Year College
Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓
  1. Embracing the Democratic Promise: Transforming Two-Year Colleges and Writing Studies thro…
    New Directions for Community Colleges  
  2. CLA and WPA: A Justice-Oriented Approach to Writing Program Administration
    Journal of Second Language Writing  
  3. A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data
    American Journal of Evaluation  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →