The Development of American Psychiatry’s Professional Style: DSM-III’s “Common Language”
Abstract
This article analyzes psychiatrists’ metadiscourse about the textual standardization of discourse practices in the third edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s diagnostic manual, DSM-III (1980). I argue that DSM-III’s “common language” represents the development of a professional style for American psychiatry, and I suggest that the codification of that style in DSM-III results in a handbook of usage. One of the professional aims of the textual standardization of the diagnostic manual is to position psychiatrists as scientists who use scientific standards of practice and scientific research methods to produce psychiatric knowledge. As a consequence, the chief style attributes of DSM-III help determine the chief professional attributes such that the textual standardization of the profession’s diagnostic manual becomes inseparable from the standardization of psychiatric knowledge.
- Journal
- Rhetoric of Health and Medicine
- Published
- 2020-05-25
- DOI
- 10.5744/rhm.2020.1008
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Topics
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Written Communication Apr 2021Sara Wilder
-
Research in the Teaching of English Aug 2011Subjectivity, Intentionality, and Manufactured Moves: Teachers’ Perceptions of Voice in the Evaluation of Secondary Students’ Writing ↗Jill V. Jeffery
-
Journal of Business and Technical Communication Oct 2004Geoffrey A. Cross
-
Written Communication Oct 1992SUSAN PECK MacDONALD
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Mar 2026Anna Krispin; Mark Pluymaekers; Dominik Mahr