Exploring Employee Perceptions of Technology Media Influence on Supervisory Relationships

Jennifer E. Fairweather ; Julie Bilodeau Johnson & Wales University

Abstract

In today’s workplace, supervisors often communicate with direct reports using technology that could influence the perceived relationship employees have with their managers. The purpose of this convergent mixed methods study was to describe the perception of how media richness, when using technology to communicate, influences the relationship direct reports have with their supervisors. To address the research question, a survey was used with a sample of 100 direct reports who frequently receive communication from their supervisors in different technology formats. The results from the study suggest that technology media influences the perceived relationship between direct reports and their supervisors. According to the results of this study, technology media may be especially helpful in bolstering the availability of supervisors, which may positively influence other elements of the supervisory relationship. The results further suggest that it may be important for all leaders to choose technology media that is personalized and preferred by the employee while also using the most effective media for the type of message. Finally, leaders should understand the concerns that employees may have around privacy and overuse of technology media.

Journal
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
10.1177/23294906241301413
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (47)

  1. Achievers Solutions Inc. (n.d.) Engagement and retention report. Achievers. https://www.achievers.com/wp-cont…
  2. Adams T., Reinert M., Fritze D., Nguyen T. (n.d.). Mind the workplace report. MHANational. https://mhanationa…
  3. Agovino T. (2019). To have and to hold amid one of the tightest labor markets in the past 50 years, employee …
  4. 10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.9
  5. 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0008
Show all 47 →
  1. 10.12735/jbm.v4i3p34
  2. 10.1037/tmb0000030
  3. Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership
  4. 10.1111/joop.12041
  5. 10.1111/jan.12165
  6. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (n.d.). The economics daily, quits rate of 2.9 percent …
  7. 10.1023/B:GRUP.0000021841.01346.35
  8. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  9. 10.5465/amj.2016.4003
  10. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches
  11. 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  12. 10.1108/09699980710780728
  13. 10.2307/25148857
  14. International Journal of Management and Human Resources
  15. 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0099
  16. 10.1111/ap.12269
  17. 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.004
  18. 10.1177/001316448904900315
  19. Center for Crime and Justice Policy
  20. 10.3233/HSM-2002-21305
  21. 10.1207/S15327663JCP1304_14
  22. Journal of Managerial Sciences
  23. 10.1002/hbe2.138
  24. 10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
  25. International Journal for the Advancement of Science & Arts
  26. World Applied Sciences Journal
  27. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.04.001
  28. Mahan T. F., Nelms D., Bearden C., Pearce B. (n.d.). 2019 retention report - workinstitute.com. Work Institut…
  29. 10.1177/0893318914524536
  30. 10.4102/ac.v11i1.144
  31. 10.1007/s10726-008-9142-x
  32. 10.21833/ijaas.2017.03.017
  33. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.004
  34. 10.1177/1548051817709007
  35. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET
  36. 10.1002/jls.20164
  37. Journal of Global Business Issues
  38. 10.1177/0893318904265803
  39. 10.1108/JOEPP-05-2017-0046
  40. 10.1080/165019701300006542
  41. 10.2224/sbp.2016.44.7.1201
  42. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.04.012