Catherine Salgado

2 articles
Arizona State University ORCID: 0009-0003-9025-1689

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Salgado

Catherine Salgado's work travels primarily in Rhetoric (100% of indexed citations) · 1 indexed citations.

By cluster

  • Rhetoric — 1

Top citing journals

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Thinking with Keywords: Investigating the Role and Nature of Professionalism Keywords in TPC Enculturation
    Abstract

    This article examines the role of TPC professionalism keywords on early career scholars' disciplinary enculturation. The article reports on a collaboration between the article's authors that explored how the deployment of professionalism keywords in teaching and research created conditions for defining what it might mean to work as a TPC professional. The article offers insights into the challenges keywords pose to forwarding non-normative understandings of professionalism that enable broader inclusion and visibility for TPC stakeholders.

    doi:10.1080/10572252.2024.2340434
  2. Situating Evaluation and Authority: Direct Sponsorship in Letters of Recommendation
    Abstract

    The letter of recommendation (LOR) is a stylized form of direct sponsorship, a rhetorical appeal that confers favor on a person or object in keeping with the writer’s—or sponsor’s—character, authority, and expertise. In response to Swales’s call to “unveil” the rhetorical features of occluded genres, this research employs a move-step analysis to determine the rhetorical features of a sample of 83 LORs written by college faculty and administrators for a nationally competitive, postgraduate fellowship. This study finds five core moves expressed in its LOR sample: (1) sponsor positioning, (2) applicant performance, (3) applicant attributes, (4) future projection, and (5) audience appeals. Our discussion offers three key insights and provides macro-level takeaways in an effort to raise rhetorical awareness for LOR writers and requestors alike.

    doi:10.1177/07410883231222955