Charlotte Brammer

4 articles
Samford University

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Brammer

Charlotte Brammer's work travels primarily in Technical Communication (66% of indexed citations) · 3 total indexed citations from 2 clusters.

By cluster

  • Technical Communication — 2
  • Rhetoric — 1

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community
    doi:10.25148/clj.8.2.009317
  2. Brown, David West. In Other Words: Lessons on Grammar, Code-Switching, and Academic Writing . Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2009. Print.
  3. Culture Shock: Teaching Writing within Interdisciplinary Contact Zones
    doi:10.37514/atd-j.2008.5.1.04
  4. Perceptions of Memo Quality: A Case Study of Engineering Practitioners, Professors, and Students
    Abstract

    One goal of college technical writing courses is to prepare students for real-world writing situations. Business writing textbooks function similarly, using guidelines, sample assignments, and model documents to help students develop rhetorical strategies to use in the workplace. Students attend class, or read and perform exercises in a textbook, with the faith that these skills will apply to workplace writing. In an attempt to better understand the similarities and differences between industry and academe's expectations of one genre of workplace writing, the memo, we compared the perceptions of memo quality by engineering faculty, students, and practitioners. All three groups responded to three sample memos taken from textbooks used by engineering professors in their undergraduate classrooms. The results indicate that students' and engineers' opinions of memo quality were more closely related to one another than to professors' comments, focusing on content, while professors were the most critical of style issues.

    doi:10.2190/ml5n-eyg1-t3f7-rer6