Joan Mullin

15 articles

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Mullin

Joan Mullin's work travels primarily in Composition & Writing Studies (66% of indexed citations) · 3 total indexed citations from 2 clusters.

By cluster

  • Composition & Writing Studies — 2
  • Digital & Multimodal — 1

Top citing journals

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Fifty Years of WAC: Where Have We Been? Where Are We Going?
    doi:10.37514/atd-j.2020.17.3.01
  2. Changing Research Practices and Access: The Research Exchange index
    doi:10.37514/wac-j.2012.23.1.01
  3. Challenging Our Practices, Supporting Our Theories: Writing Mentors As Change Agents Across Discourse Communities
    doi:10.37514/atd-j.2008.5.2.03
  4. Enlivening WAC Programs Old and New
    doi:10.37514/wac-j.2007.18.1.01
  5. Designing Your Writing/Writing Your Design: Art and Design Students Talk About the Process of Writing and the Process of Design
    Abstract

    How to write, and the relationship between images and writing, has been changing within the academy. Some indication of this can be seen in the new composition texts that emphasize reading visuals or teaching students in our largely visual culture (e.g. Faigley, George, Selfe, & Palchik , 2004; Alfano & O'Brien, 2005; Ruszkiewicz, Anderson, & Friend, 2006). However, little account has been taken of students' perceptions of the visual and the written. In order to determine whether such perceptions might alter our understandings of the relationship between the image and the word, as well as revise our pedagogy, we conducted joint research with art and design students in the UK and US. We address here four of the areas of interest that emerged from our data: students' personal relationship with writing/art and design, the role of peers and audience, engagement with process, and conceptions of time. The research supported some common assumptions about teaching writing to students with visual preferences, and challenged others. As a result of these student voices, we offer some reflections that reinforce current pedagogies and suggest changes of our classroom methods.

    doi:10.37514/atd-j.2006.3.2.05
  6. From the Editors
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1501
  7. From the Editors
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1441
  8. From the Editors
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1488
  9. From the Editors
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1442
  10. From the Editors
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1454
  11. From the Editors
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1408
  12. From the Editors
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1436
  13. From the Editors
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1397
  14. From the Editors
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1411
  15. From the Editors
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1376