Mary Hedengren

7 articles
The University of Texas at Austin

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Hedengren

Mary Hedengren's work travels primarily in Composition & Writing Studies (100% of indexed citations) · 2 indexed citations.

By cluster

  • Composition & Writing Studies — 2

Top citing journals

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. An Empirical Study of Non-Native English Speaking Tutors in the Writing Center
    Abstract

    As linguistic diversity increases on American campuses, writing center staffs are also becoming more diverse— although there has been little empirical research about non-native English speaking (NNS) tutors. Concerns about the native speaker fallacy, although prevalent in TESOL literature, are less documented in writing center studies. The primary purpose of this study is to determine what, if any, differences exist between the tutoring methods of native English-speaking (NES) and non-native English speaking (NNS) tutors and whether some of these differences might be ascribed to linguistic bias. In this study, eight writing center tutors, four NES and four NNS, were observed during sessions with one NES and one NNS writer each. Sixteen naturalistic sessions were transcribed and triangulated with interviews and exit surveys with all participants. Tutor language t-units from these sessions were coded into four broad categories and seven sub-categories. The results indicate that while NES and NNS tutors generally use similar types of language while tutoring, the NES tutors are more directive with NNS writers, reflecting traditional writing center training. NNS tutors are more directive overall, but are especially directive with NES writers. Results also indicate that, despite popular wisdom to the contrary, NNS tutors are less emotionally responsive while working with NNS writers than with native English speakers. The tutors and writers in this study did not indicate the native speaker fallacy as greatly impacting their sessions. Keywords : Non-native speakers of English, peer tutoring, writing, native speaker fallacy

  2. Review: What We Mean When We Say "Meaningful" Writing: A Review of 'The Meaningful Writing Project'
    doi:10.37514/wac-j.2018.29.1.13
  3. Tell Me What You Really Think: Lessons from Negative Student Feedback
    doi:10.7771/2832-9414.1817
  4. Kant and the Promise of Rhetoric, Scott Stroud: University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2014. 288 pages. $34.95 paperback
    doi:10.1080/07350198.2016.1215006
  5. The Writing Teacher Who Writes
    Abstract

    Both creative writing and composition seek to teach writing, yet their pedagogical approaches are poles apart, especially concerning instructors. Creative writing instructors serve as “mentor-models,” whose authority comes from their writing practice rather than (only) departmental sanction. Despite potential pitfalls, a mentor-model approach could reaffirm composition instructors' identities as writers.

    doi:10.1215/15314200-3435820
  6. Review of 'Working with Faculty Writers
    doi:10.37514/wac-j.2016.27.1.10
  7. Do You Believe in Good Academic Writing?
    doi:10.37514/wac-j.2015.26.1.06