The Peer Review Sep 2018 web Open Access

An Empirical Study of Non-Native English Speaking Tutors in the Writing Center

Mary Hedengren

Abstract

As linguistic diversity increases on American campuses, writing center staffs are also becoming more diverse— although there has been little empirical research about non-native English speaking (NNS) tutors. Concerns about the native speaker fallacy, although prevalent in TESOL literature, are less documented in writing center studies. The primary purpose of this study is to determine what, if any, differences exist between the tutoring methods of native English-speaking (NES) and non-native English speaking (NNS) tutors and whether some of these differences might be ascribed to linguistic bias. In this study, eight writing center tutors, four NES and four NNS, were observed during sessions with one NES and one NNS writer each. Sixteen naturalistic sessions were transcribed and triangulated with interviews and exit surveys with all participants. Tutor language t-units from these sessions were coded into four broad categories and seven sub-categories. The results indicate that while NES and NNS tutors generally use similar types of language while tutoring, the NES tutors are more directive with NNS writers, reflecting traditional writing center training. NNS tutors are more directive overall, but are especially directive with NES writers. Results also indicate that, despite popular wisdom to the contrary, NNS tutors are less emotionally responsive while working with NNS writers than with native English speakers. The tutors and writers in this study did not indicate the native speaker fallacy as greatly impacting their sessions. Keywords : Non-native speakers of English, peer tutoring, writing, native speaker fallacy

Journal
The Peer Review
Published
2018-09
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
writing centers peer tutoring empirical research multilingual writers translingualism race and writing
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Citation data not yet available for this article.

Citation data is not available for The Peer Review. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.

Related Articles

  1. Writing Center Journal 2023
    Linguistic Diversity from the K–12 Classroom to the Writing Center: Rethinking Expectations on Inclusive Grammar Instruction ↗
    Zoe Esterly, Hannah L.W Swoyer,; Bridget A. Draxler
    teacher development writing centers peer tutoring multilingual writers translingualism grammar and mechanics race and writing
  2. The Peer Review Sep 2020
    International Writing Tutors Leveraging Linguistic Diversity at a Hispanic-Serving Institution’s Writing Center ↗
    rhetorical criticism writing pedagogy creative writing graduate education teacher development writing centers peer tutoring professional writing qualitative research multilingual writers translingualism race and writing editorial matter
  3. The Peer Review Sep 2025
    The Writing Center as a Rebel Space: Stories of Tutoring and Writing with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ↗
    Ghada Seifeddine
    discourse analysis teacher development writing centers peer tutoring empirical research multimodality literacy studies race and writing disability studies editorial matter
  4. Writing Center Journal 2025
    Native-Speakerism and Multilingual Student Anxiety in One-to-One Mentoring ↗
    Grace Lee-Amuzie
    writing pedagogy writing centers peer tutoring multilingual writers race and writing editorial matter
  5. The Peer Review Apr 2024
    Between the Lines of Linguistic Justice: Lumbee English and Value Meshing in the Writing Center ↗
    Morgan Linn Zacheus; Elise Dixon
    african american rhetorics collaborative writing writing centers peer tutoring translingualism race and writing