Theresa Jarnagin Enos

3 articles

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Enos

Theresa Jarnagin Enos's work travels primarily in Rhetoric (50% of indexed citations) · 10 total indexed citations from 3 clusters.

By cluster

  • Rhetoric — 5
  • Composition & Writing Studies — 3
  • Digital & Multimodal — 2

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Hunting Jim W. Corder
    Abstract

    Introduction: The Hunt for Traces of Remnants [T]here are remnants around me, or traces of remnants—misunderstood and misremembered moments and events, ghostly presences, hazy icons. I'm such a tra...

    doi:10.1080/07350198.2013.739483
  2. Back-Tracking and Forward-Gazing: Marking the Dimensions of Graduate Core Curricula in Rhetoric and Composition
    Abstract

    The discipline of rhetoric and composition is experiencing a change in its core curricula as graduate programs are replacing a traditional set of core courses with a more customizable, elective plan of study that focuses on specializations. Graduate student dissertations predict the flow and direction of the field, determining curricular change. Programs are also being responsive to a trend in the listing of specialist positions in the MLA JIL. The 2000 and 2008 Rhetoric Review surveys of graduate curricula as well as the authors' most recent survey results reveal a change in values from general to more specialist curricula.

    doi:10.1080/07350198.2011.552383
  3. How Seriously Are We Taking Professionalization? A Report on Graduate Curricula in Rhetoric and Composition
    Abstract

    This essay analyzes curricula and textbooks currently used in graduate programs in rhetoric and composition. Drawing on data from a web-based survey of 592 faculty in rhetoric and composition, we raise two main questions: How adequately are graduate students being prepared for their future professional lives, and should professionalization be a primary goal in graduate education?

    doi:10.1207/s15327981rr2502_5