Tina Coffelt

2 articles

Loading profile…

Publication Timeline

Co-Author Network

Research Topics

Who Reads Coffelt

Tina Coffelt's work travels primarily in Technical Communication (100% of indexed citations) · 8 indexed citations.

By cluster

  • Technical Communication — 8

Counts include only citations from indexed journals that deposit reference lists with CrossRef. Authors whose readers publish primarily in venues without reference deposits will appear less central than they are. See coverage notes →

  1. Measuring Business and Professional Communication Skills
    Abstract

    Understanding the expectations of employers contributes to the relevancy of business and professional communication (BPC) courses. Studies that bridge the gap between course content and workplace expectations support this process. This article presents findings from a scale development procedure to analyze BPC skills using a multimodal perspective. Employers ( N = 260) were asked what skills they perceive to be communication and how proficient they expect a recent college graduate to be to better understand the expectations that graduates face when entering the job market. The findings have implications for course design, curriculum selection, and program organization.

    doi:10.1177/23294906221082235
  2. An Analysis of the Academic Environment in Business and Professional Communication
    Abstract

    While previous research in business communication has surveyed business and professional communication instructors regarding their courses, it has not yet asked instructors about additional factors that affect their ability to teach and their students’ ability to learn. These factors include job satisfaction, institutional and collegial support, academic rank, physical teaching environment, teaching and learning resources, and student issues. This study examines the results of a survey of business and professional communication instructors regarding these factors, discusses implications for the disciplines of business and professional communication, and suggests additional avenues for advocacy and research.

    doi:10.1177/2329490620949862