The affordances of language choice in negotiation of oral peer feedback on L2 writing

Avary Carhill-Poza ; Lili Tian Renmin University of China ; Jesse Rubio University of Massachusetts Boston

Abstract

Peer feedback has long been an essential part of a process approach to writing in university EFL classrooms. This study examines how the affordances of peer feedback are shaped by students’ language choice. We interviewed 27 Chinese university students in an English writing course about their experiences giving and receiving oral peer feedback on an initial and revised draft of an essay. Semi-structured interviews were analyzed thematically and triangulated with stimulated recall, transcripts of peer review discussions, and content analyses of learners’ incorporation of feedback across essay drafts to better understand perceptions and actions following from language choice during oral peer review of their L2 writing. Findings show that students incorporated 56 percent of oral peer feedback instances when revising, and almost all of these occurred in students’ first language, Chinese. Participants described the L1 affordances of clarity, efficiency, and pragmatics as important considerations when giving oral feedback on peer writing. Through triangulation of oral peer feedback discussions, change across essay drafts, and student interviews, language choice is shown to be a supportive practice for L2 writers in oral peer feedback. In contrast to previous research that suggests that the L1 is used primarily for solving problems and less frequently for discussion of content, our findings show that students chose to use their L1 for peer review because of the perceived support offered for improving their writing – namely, clarity, efficiency, and pragmatics.

Journal
Writing and Pedagogy
Published
2024-04-25
DOI
10.1558/wap.21859
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Assessing Writing
  2. Assessing Writing
Also cites 31 works outside this index ↓
  1. Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone …
  2. Allen, D. & Katayama, A. (2016). Relative second language proficiency and the giving and receiving of written…
  3. Berggren, J. (2015). Learning from giving feedback: A study of secondary-level students. ELT Journal, 69(1), …
  4. Brooks, F. B. & Donato, R. (1994). Vygotskyan approaches to understanding foreign language learner discourse …
  5. Carhill-Poza, A. (2018). Silenced partners: The role of bilingual peers in secondary school contexts. Teacher…
  6. Cenoz, J. & Gorter, D. (2021). Pedagogical translanguaging. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Connor, U. & Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? …
  8. de Guerrero, M. C. M. & Villamil, O. S. (1994). Social cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revisio…
  9. DiCamilla, F. J. & Antón, M. (2012). Functions of L1 in the collaborative interaction of beginning and advanc…
  10. Gao, X. & Ren, W. (2019). Controversies of bilingual education in China. International Journal of Bilingual E…
  11. Hu, G. & Lam, S. T. E. (2010). Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: Exploring peer re…
  12. Kibler, A. (2010). Writing through two languages: First language expertise in a language minority classroom. …
  13. Lantolf, J. P. & A. Pavlenko (1995). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Annual Review of A…
  14. Leung, C. (2016). English as an additional language – a genealogy of language-in-education policies and refle…
  15. Li, S. & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System. S…
  16. Macaro, E. (2005). Codeswitching in the L2 classroom: A communication and learning strategy. In E. Llurda (Ed…
  17. McDonough, K., Crawford, W. J. & De Vleeschauwer, J. (2016). Thai EFL learners’ interaction during collaborat…
  18. Selvi, A. F. (2019). Qualitative content analysis. In The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied l…
  19. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language …
  20. Tian, L. & Li, L. (2019). Chinese EFL learners’ perception of peer oral and written feedback as providers, re…
  21. Tsui, A. B. M. & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Languag…
  22. van Lier, L. (2008). Ecological-semiotic perspectives on educational linguistics. The handbook of educational…
  23. Villamil, O. S. & de Guerrero, M. C. M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activitie…
  24. Walqui, A. & Schmida, M. (2022). Reconceptualizing scaffolding for English learners. In Scaffolding for multi…
  25. Yang, M., Badger, R. & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writi…
  26. Yu, S. (2015). What factors shape the collaborative pattern of group interaction during peer feedback in the …
  27. Yu, S. & Hu, G. (2017). Can higher-proficiency L2 learners benefit from working with lower-proficiency partne…
  28. Yu, S. & Lee, I. (2016a). Exploring Chinese students’ strategy use in a cooperative peer feedback writing gro…
  29. Yu, S. & Lee, I. (2016b). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461…
  30. Yu, S. & Lee, I. (2016c). Understanding the role of learners with low English language proficiency in peer fe…
  31. Zhang, M. (2018). Collaborative writing in the EFL classroom: The effects of L1 and L2 use. System, 76, 1–12.…