How Do University Students Attempt to Avoid Plagiarism?
Abstract
Over the past decade, university student plagiarism has received considerable attention, and a number of text-based studies have investigated the extent to which student writers copy source text language into their own written work. Much less is known, however, about student paraphrasing. To address this gap, the present study analyzed a corpus of summaries written by a group of native English speakers (n=124) writing in their first language (L1) and by a group of students from other language backgrounds (n=103) writing in their second language (L2), and aimed to identify the major grammatical strategies that students employed when paraphrasing source text language. While many of the paraphrases analyzed contained copied strings of 5 or more words, most did not. And while the strategies of deletion and synonym substitution were frequently used, many students, both L1 and L2 writers, made a number of grammatical changes to the original. Students who avoided copied language used a common paraphrasing strategy: Rather than simply select individual words to replace with synonyms, they divided the original excerpt into its major components (e.g. subject, main verb, direct object) and transformed those components into new units typically of a different grammatical form) that expressed the same idea. These findings suggest that continued investigation of student paraphrasing may help to refine our understanding of the linguistic strategies associated with effective textual borrowing.
- Journal
- Writing and Pedagogy
- Published
- 2010-12-18
- DOI
- 10.1558/wap.v2i2.193
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Assessing Writing Jul 2026A multidimensional approach to the impact of achievement emotions on high school students' L2 writing performance ↗Jianhua Zhang
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026“Article laundry” or “tutor in pocket?”: Multilingual writers’ generative AI-assisted writing in professional settings ↗Qianqian Zhang-Wu
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026How do L2 writing subskills interact hierarchically? Insights from diagnostic classification models ↗Farshad Effatpanah; Hamdollah Ravand; Mahmoud Abdi Tabari; Yi-Hsin Chen; Olga Kunina-Habenicht
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026Unveiling the complex interactions of mindset, emotions, and self-regulated learning in EFL writing: A latent profile and network analysis ↗Jialing Sun; Lin Sophie Teng; Qikai Wang
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026How writing prompts influence analytic trait scores: A differential feature functioning analysis for English language learners ↗İdil Sayın; Hacer Hande Uysal