Abstract

Abstract This essay argues that Whateley's rhetorical and logical theories are systematically related to his religious thought and the religious controversies in which he was involved. It analyzes Whately's works on reasoning in light of his pertinent religious notions, namely, a distinction between true and nominal Christianity; rejection of idolatry; abrogation of Mosaic Law; the relationship of the empirical facts of God's Creation and Revelation to human speculations; the priesthood of all believers; and the concomitant necessity of private judgment.

Journal
Rhetorica
Published
2006-02-01
DOI
10.1525/rh.2006.24.1.37
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Rhetorica
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/00335632909360777
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  2. 10.1080/03637757609375922
    Communication Monographs  
  3. 10.1080/00335639809384212
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  4. 10.2307/3166881
  5. 10.2307/2709186
  6. 10.2307/3167906
  7. 10.1080/10417948809372725
    The Southern Speech Communication Journal  
  8. 10.1023/A:1003429504608
  9. 10.1080/00335636309382590
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  10. 10.1353/par.2000.0014