Speech Acts and Indirect Threats in Ad Baculum Arguments. A Reply to Budzynska and Witek — Pinakes

Argumentation Aug 2014

Speech Acts and Indirect Threats in Ad Baculum Arguments. A Reply to Budzynska and Witek

Douglas Walton University of Windsor

Journal: Argumentation
Published: 2014-08-01
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-014-9318-2
CompPile
Open Access: Closed
Topics: discourse analysis editorial matter
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (8)

Budzynska, K. and M. Witek. 21014. Non-inferential aspects of Ad Hominem and Ad Baculum, Argumentation, to appear.
HP Grice (1975)

Syntax and semantics
S Levinson (1983)

Pragmatics

↗
F Macagno (2013)

Perspectives on pragmatics and philosophy

↗
Reed, C. (2011). Implicit Speech Acts Are Ubiquitous. Why? They Join the Dots, Zenker, F. (ed.). Argument cul…

Show all 8 →

CW Tindale (2007)

Fallacies and argument appraisal

↗
FH Eemeren Van (2010)

Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse

↗
D Walton (2000)

Scare tactics

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network → Build reading path →