Argumentation Without Arguments

Henry Prakken

doi:10.1007/s10503-011-9208-9

Argumentation May 2011 Open Access

Argumentation Without Arguments

Henry Prakken University of Groningen

Abstract

A well-known ambiguity in the term ‘argument’ is that of argument as an inferential structure and argument as a kind of dialogue. In the first sense, an argument is a structure with a conclusion supported by one or more grounds, which may or may not be supported by further grounds. Rules for the construction and criteria for the quality of arguments in this sense are a matter of logic. In the second sense, arguments have been studied as a form of dialogical interaction, in which human or artificial agents aim to resolve a conflict of opinion by verbal means. Rules for conducting such dialogues and criteria for their quality are part of dialogue theory. Usually, formal accounts of argumentation dialogues in logic and artificial intelligence presuppose an argument-based logic. That is, the ways in which dialogue participants support and attack claims are modelled as the construction of explicit arguments and counterarguments (in the inferential sense). However, in this paper formal models of argumentation dialogues are discussed that do not presuppose arguments as inferential structures. The motivation for such models is that there are forms of inference that are not most naturally cast in the form of arguments (such as abduction, statistical reasoning and coherence-based reasoning) but that can still be the subject of argumentative dialogue. Some recent work in artificial intelligence is discussed which embeds non-argumentative inference in an argumentative dialogue system, and some general observations are drawn from this discussion.

Journal: Argumentation
Published: 2011-05-01
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-011-9208-9
CompPile
Open Access: OA PDF Hybrid
Topics: argument artificial intelligence
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

Aspeitia (2012)

Words and Images in Argumentation

Argumentation
Bex et al. (2012)

Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact-Finding…

Argumentation

References (24)

FJ Bex (2011)

Arguments, stories and criminal evidence. A formal hybrid theory

↗
FJ Bex (2008)

Computational models of argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2008, 73–84
L Console (1991)

Console, L., D.T. Dupré, and P. Torasso. 1991. On the relationship between abduction and deduction. Journal o…

Journal of Logic and Computation ↗
PM Dung (1995)

Dung, P.M. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic …

Artificial Intelligence ↗
TF Gordon (1995)

The pleadings game. An artificial intelligence model of procedural justice

Show all 24 →

CL Hamblin (1970)

Fallacies
CL Hamblin (1971)

Hamblin, C.L. 1971. Mathematical models of dialogue. Theoria 37: 130–155.

Theoria ↗
Joseph, S. 2010. Coherence-based computational agency. Doctoral dissertation Universitat Autònoma de Barcelon…
Joseph, S., and Prakken, H. 2009. Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus.In Proceedings of the twel…

↗
AR Lodder (1999)

DiaLaw. On legal justification and dialogical models of argumentation

↗
RP Loui (1998)

Loui, R.P. 1998. Process and policy: Resource–bounded nondemonstrative reasoning. Computational Intelligence …

Computational Intelligence ↗
JD Mackenzie (1979)

Mackenzie, J.D. 1979. Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 117–133.

Journal of Philosophical Logic ↗
Modgil, S., and Caminada, M. 2009. Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks. In Ar…

↗
S Parsons (2003)

Parsons, S., M. Wooldridge, and L. Amgoud. 2003. Properties and complexity of some formal inter-agent dialogu…

Journal of Logic and Computation ↗
H Prakken (2005)

Prakken, H. 2005. Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computa…

Journal of Logic and Computation ↗
H Prakken (2006)

Prakken, H. 2006. Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. The Knowledge Engineering Review 21: 163–188. Revis…

The Knowledge Engineering Review ↗
H Prakken (2008)

Prakken, H. 2008. A formal model of adjudication dialogues. Artificial Intelligence and Law 16: 305–328.

Artificial Intelligence and Law ↗
H Prakken (2010)

Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation. An examination of douglas Walton’s theories of re…
H Prakken (1997)

Prakken, H., and G. Sartor. 1997. Argument–based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journ…

Journal of Applied Non–classical Logics ↗
(2009)

Argumentation in artificial intelligence
P Thagard (2002)

Coherence in thought and action
DN Walton (1996)

Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning
DN Walton (1995)

Commitment in dialogue. Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning
J Woods (1978)

Woods, J., and D.N. Walton. 1978. Arresting circles in formal dialogues. Journal of Philosophical Logic 7: 73–90.

Journal of Philosophical Logic ↗

CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Argumentation Without Arguments

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

References (24)

Related Articles