Connecting Twitter With Scholarly Networks: Exploring HCI Scholars’ Interactions From an SNA Approach

Long-Jing Hsu National Taiwan University ; Weijane Lin National Taiwan University ; Hsiu-Ping Yueh

Abstract

<roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Background:</b></roman> Building a reputable network on Twitter is viewed as impactful in several scholarly disciplines, but little is known about the professional and interdisciplinary human-computer interaction (HCI) community. This study combined two approaches from scholarly communication and technical communication to capture the static and dynamic features of the HCI scholar Twitter network. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Literature review:</b></roman> Related studies that described the scholarly reputation built through Twitter and social networking in the field of HCI were reviewed and discussed. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Research questions:</b></roman> 1. In which countries are HCI scholars more likely to follow their peers in the same country? 2. What are the characteristics (country, reputation) and actions (reciprocity) of HCI scholars who are more likely to build HCI scholarly network profiles on Twitter? <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Research methodology:</b></roman> The network analysis method of the exponential random graph model (ERGM) was adopted to trace and visualize current follower networks on Twitter. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Results and discussion:</b></roman> We found that 22.9% of HCI scholars use Twitter and that reciprocity and country of current employment best drive the Twitter connections of scholars. Characteristics of HCI scholars’ tie formation online are also illustrated and discussed. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Implications for practice:</b></roman> This study contributes to field studies of professional networks by identifying the structural properties and factors that influence scholars’ search for professional development on Twitter. The empirical findings should be a helpful reference for HCI professional societies and individual scholars in operating online professional networks.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2022-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2022.3205511
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (85) · 4 in this index

  1. 10.1007/s40299-018-0424-z
  2. 10.1145/3411764.3445488
  3. 10.1080/1461670X.2014.939849
  4. 10.1198/016214507000000446
  5. 10.1086/680060
Show all 85 →
  1. 10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.006
  2. 10.29024/joa.13
  3. 10.1007/s10734-015-9900-z
  4. 10.1093/icc/dtv037
  5. 10.1007/s13278-019-0612-8
  6. 10.1080/07370024.2013.823823
  7. 10.1145/1693042.1693076
  8. 10.1177/2053951715589417
  9. Twitter and society: An introduction
    Twitter & Society
  10. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.02.002
  11. 10.1080/19415257.2018.1562957
  12. 10.1177/0894439318763580
  13. 10.1109/HICSS.2006.394
  14. 10.1177/0961000618769977
  15. 10.1080/17439884.2015.1015547
  16. 10.1177/0899764020959472
  17. 10.1080/10447318.2020.1819668
  18. 10.1002/asi.22798
  19. 10.1093/reseval/rvv049
  20. 10.3390/su11195172
  21. 10.1016/j.joi.2017.02.011
  22. 10.1007/s11192-017-2497-5
  23. 10.1371/journal.pone.0203594
  24. 10.1145/3394231.3397889
  25. 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.002
  26. 10.1177/2056305120969914
  27. 10.2307/2786835
  28. An Introduction to Exponential Random Graph Modeling
  29. 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.011
  30. Technical Communication Quarterly
  31. Evaluating scholars&#x2019; impact and influence: Cross-sectional study of the correlatio…
    J Med Internet Res
  32. 10.1007/s11423-020-09790-5
  33. 10.1177/1077699014550092
  34. 10.1080/1360144X.2018.1520109
  35. 10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2859
  36. 10.1007/s11192-018-2970-9
  37. 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00449.x
  38. 10.1108/LHT-05-2019-0101
  39. 10.1007/s11192-020-03636-w
  40. 10.1177/0093650214559601
  41. 10.1177/009365089016005004
  42. 10.1177/1461444817707349
  43. 10.1080/03637751.2020.1869797
  44. 10.1007/s11192-016-2126-8
  45. 10.1145/3334480.3375068
  46. 10.1108/01443570910986201
  47. 10.1007/s11192-011-0552-1
  48. 10.1002/bult.2013.1720390404
  49. 10.1002/asi.23833
  50. 10.1093/reseval/rvy039
  51. 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.004
  52. 10.1080/10447318.2018.1471838
  53. 10.1016/j.adro.2017.06.003
  54. I like the term #articlelevelmetrics, but it fails to imply *diversity* of measures. Late…
  55. How WEIRD is HCI? Extending HCI principles to other countries and cultures
    Proc 33rd ACM Conf Human Factors Comput Syst
  56. 10.1007/s11192-019-03112-0
  57. 10.1080/07370024.2018.1469410
  58. 10.1371/journal.pone.0064841
  59. 10.1145/2696863
  60. 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027796.55585.61
  61. 10.2307/41410412
  62. 10.3145/epi.2019.ene.02
  63. 10.1002/asi.23825
  64. First-citation of journal articles and scholarly communication speed: A case study of IS & LS
    J Library Inf Studies
  65. Technical Communication Quarterly
  66. 10.1109/ASONAM.2009.65
  67. 10.1109/PICMET.2007.4349633
  68. 10.1145/985921.986203
  69. 10.1007/s11192-013-1081-x
  70. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  71. 10.1007/BF02459299
  72. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  73. 10.1177/0894439316671698
  74. 10.1002/asi.24458
  75. Social network analysis and data visualization of MIS international collaboration in Taiwan
    Library Hi Tech
  76. 10.1145/3411763.3451646
  77. 10.1162/qss_a_00047
  78. 10.1002/ecs2.2899
  79. 10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014321
  80. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.032