Abstract

This article demonstrates, by example, 2 approaches to the analysis of knowledge work. Both methods draw on network as a framework: a Latourian actor–network theory analysis and a network analysis. The shared object of analysis is a digital humanities and digital media research lab that is the outcome of the collective and coordinated efforts of researchers and other stakeholders at North Carolina State University. The authors show how the two methods are drawn to different objects of study, different data sources, and different assumptions about how data can be reduced and made understandable. The authors conclude by arguing that although these methods yield different outlooks on the same object, their findings are mutually informing.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2015-01-02
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2015.975961
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (19)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Written Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 19 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Written Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Written Communication
  6. Written Communication
  7. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  8. Technical Communication Quarterly
  9. Written Communication
  10. Written Communication
  11. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  12. Written Communication
  13. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  14. Written Communication

Cites in this index (23)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 23 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Written Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly
  8. Technical Communication Quarterly
  9. Technical Communication Quarterly
  10. Technical Communication Quarterly
  11. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  12. Technical Communication Quarterly
  13. Technical Communication Quarterly
  14. Technical Communication Quarterly
  15. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  16. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  17. Written Communication
  18. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 26 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1109/TPC.2012.2190345
  2. 10.1215/9780822383550-008
  3. 10.2307/3341747
  4. 10.4337/9781845421663.00010
  5. 10.4324/NOE0415364737.ch4
  6. 10.1017/CBO9780511812774
  7. 10.1016/j.jss.2013.11.1077
  8. 10.1086/225469
  9. 10.1080/01972240290108195
  10. 10.1080/13691180500146185
  11. 10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2
  12. 10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001
  13. 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03479.x
  14. 10.1177/026327602761899165
  15. McNely B. J. (2010). Exploring a sustainable and public information ecology. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM I…
  16. 10.1215/9780822384151
  17. NetWORKers and their activity in intensional networks
    Computer Supported Cooperative Work  
  18. 10.1109/TPC.2012.2188590
  19. Potts L. (2008). Diagramming with actor network theory: A method for modeling holistic experience . Paper pre…
  20. 10.1109/IPCC.2005.1494198
  21. 10.7551/mitpress/6875.001.0001
  22. 10.1017/CBO9780511509605
  23. 10.1287/isre.7.1.111
  24. 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342
  25. 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00455.x
  26. 10.1109/TPC.2010.2044620
CrossRef global citation count: 33 View in citation network →