Abstract

In this article, I argue that technical reporting and documentation processes function to mitigate uncertainty and enable complex systems in the endeavor of big science. The argument draws on two years of field research investigating technical reporting and documentation processes at a federally funded supercomputing center dedicated to scientific research. A central question the study sought to answer was, “How does one build a new supercomputer?” One of the answers that emerged is that supercomputers are built by the genre assemblages of documents that mitigate financial, political, and technological uncertainties, and their attendant risks, that are inherent to technoscientific cutting-edge enterprises. Given their centrality, these genre assemblages function as essential infrastructure for the U.S. national laboratory system and for big science endeavors in general. In conclusion, this article argues that documentation that mitigates uncertainty serves an important infrastructural function for organizational life more generally.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2020-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088320939541
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

Cites in this index (18)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Written Communication
Show all 18 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Written Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Technical Communication Quarterly
  7. Written Communication
  8. Written Communication
  9. Technical Communication Quarterly
  10. Written Communication
  11. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  12. Written Communication
  13. Written Communication
Also cites 25 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/j.aos.2010.07.003
  2. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567928.001.0001
  3. 10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001
  4. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262015554.001.0001
  5. 10.4324/9781315815459
  6. 10.2307/j.ctt4cgpfh.4
  7. 10.1093/scipol/scu064
  8. Hallonsten O., Heinze T. (2012). Institutional persistence through gradual organizational adaptation: Analysi…
  9. Jacob M., Hallonsten O. (2012). The persistence of big science and megascience in research and innovation pol…
  10. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00889.x
  11. 10.4324/9781315171418
  12. 10.14393/LL63-v31n3a2015-5
  13. 10.4324/9781351203074-7
  14. 10.1109/IPCC.2016.7740504
  15. 10.1145/2666216.2666225
  16. 10.1109/IPCC.2017.8013967
  17. 10.4324/9781410606815
  18. 10.7551/mitpress/6875.001.0001
  19. 10.1145/1026533.1026560
  20. 10.1017/CBO9780511509605
  21. 10.1177/00027649921955326
  22. 10.1287/isre.7.1.111
  23. Turner M. S. (2015). Big science is hard but worth it. Science, 348(6233), 375. https://doi.org/10.1126/scien…
  24. Westfall C. (2012). Institutional persistence and the material transformation of the US national labs: The cu…
  25. Control through communication: The rise of system in American management
CrossRef global citation count: 14 View in citation network →