POWR: A Framework to Bridge Research Planning and Dissertation Writing in Engineering and Information Technology

Julie Holden Monash University ; Li Lian Khaw Monash University

Abstract

<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Problem:</b> A Ph.D. is an extended study that requires an initial plan to conceptualize a research project, which is then refined, with results presented in a written dissertation. Diverse entry pathways to research mean that many Ph.D. candidates may experience difficulties in conceptualizing, aligning, and writing up their projects. Thus, there is a need for an effective framework to help students conceptualize their research, as well as a mechanism to transfer it to writing in the required genres. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Key concepts:</b> The key concepts for this tutorial center on two fundamental groupings: sociocognitive and sociocultural planning processes, along with genre dissertation writing. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Key lessons:</b> We present the Plan, Organize, Write, Research (POWR) framework. POWR proposes a way to link a sociocognitive and sociocultural planning process and the structuring of research communication. The framework has two stages: POWRa and POWRb. POWRa provides a way to conceptualize the iterative planning process underpinning a long-term project, and provides a bridge to POWRb, the more formal genre communication of the project, through the dissertation document. <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Implications for practice:</b> The tutorial provides a framework to articulate a research project in a supervisory and team environment. It uses terminology and structure relevant to engineering and information technology theses to illustrate the framework. The framework provides an iterative decision-making structure that is systematic, explicit, and equitable for research project planning and transfer into the writing genre of doctoral dissertations.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2022-09-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2022.3187320
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (28) · 3 in this index

  1. Australian qualifications framework. (2022 Mar.). The Australian qualifications framework
  2. Higher education facts and figure 2020
  3. 10.1080/03075079.2015.1118031
  4. 10.18260/1-2--15251
  5. Writing challenges for graduate students in engineering and technology
Show all 28 →
  1. 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1969.tb00654.x
  2. 10.1080/07294360.2011.554388
  3. 10.2307/356600
  4. 10.4148/1051-0834.1056
  5. A sociocultural theory of writing
  6. 10.1016/s1060-3743(02)00124-8
  7. The Construction of Negotiated Meaning: A Social Cognitive Theory of Writing
  8. What do sociocultural studies of writing tell us about learning to write
  9. Writing research from a cognitive perspective
  10. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
  11. 10.1080/00335638409383686
  12. 10.4324/9780429352409-19
  13. 10.1515/9783110214406.165
  14. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.004
  15. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.003
  16. CF 37: The concept of discourse community
    Comp. Forum
  17. 10.37514/PER-B.2009.2324.2.14
  18. Unblocking occluded genres in graduate writing: Thesis and dissertation support services …
    Comp. Forum
  19. Journal of Writing Analytics
  20. Generic moves in Ph.D. theses introductions
  21. 10.1016/s0346-251x(98)00039-6
  22. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  23. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication