Abstract

<roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Background:</b></roman> Although a number of empirical studies have investigated communication challenges during recent years, we still need to discover the most critical challenges that face communication when agile development is geographically distributed. We also need to discover how successful geographically distributed agile development (GDAD) organizations deal with these challenges. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Literature review:</b></roman> Most previous studies reported that the critical challenges facing GDAD communication can be categorized into five themes: differences in cultures, different time zones, different spoken languages, different personal skills, and the efficiency and effectiveness of communication tools used. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Research questions:</b></roman> 1. What are the challenges of communication between GDAD teams? 2. How can the impact of GDAD communication challenges be mitigated? <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Methodology:</b></roman> Data were collected by interviewing 12 members of a three-team organization using distributed agile development. These teams are distributed over three countries; the main team located in Australia, the developers’ team located in China, and the testers’ team located in India. A thematic analysis technique was used to identify communication challenges and practices used to mitigate the effect of these challenges. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Results:</b></roman> Our findings reveal that the five challenges are still critical to GDAD. Moreover, we report a new critical challenge of communication in GDAD, the insufficient documentation provided by distributed teams and members. In addition, we recommend several practices to mitigate the impact of these challenges. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Conclusions:</b></roman> Communication among distributed agile development teams still faces several critical challenges, and the solutions to these challenges provided in recent years have not been sufficient. This fact prompts the need for more research on how the impact of these challenges can be lessened.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2021-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2021.3110396
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (51) · 16 in this index

  1. 10.1186/s40411-018-0048-2
  2. 10.4018/jdm.2011100104
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Agile global software development communication challenges: A systematic review
    Proc 18th Pacific Asia Conf Inf Syst
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 51 →
  1. 10.1007/s10664-008-9065-9
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  6. 10.17705/1CAIS.03615
  7. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  8. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  9. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2895690
  10. 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106122
  11. 10.1007/978-3-642-20677-1_8
  12. A framework for considering opportunities and threats in distributed software development
    Proc Int Workshop Distrib Softw Develop
  13. 10.17706/jsw.10.6.681-694
  14. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  15. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  16. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  17. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  18. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing among Five Approaches
  19. How many qualitative interviews is enough
  20. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990389
  21. 10.3991/ijim.v14i11.13269
  22. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  23. 10.1016/j.im.2015.08.003
  24. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2953008
  25. 10.1016/j.infsof.2006.01.004
  26. 10.1109/TEM.2009.2013829
  27. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2803685
  28. Assessing the adoption level of scaled agile development: A maturity model for scaled agi…
    Journal of Software: Evolution and Process
  29. 10.1177/8756972818798980
  30. 10.1145/2491627.2491642
  31. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  32. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976723
  33. 10.1016/j.csi.2016.06.002
  34. An industrial case of exploiting product line architectures in agile software development
    Proc 13th Int Softw Product Line Conf
  35. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924404
  36. 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.10.008
  37. Prioritizing challenges of agile process in distributed software development environment …
    Journal of Software: Evolution and Process
  38. 10.1007/978-3-531-92052-8_42
  39. Qualitative Data Analysis An Expanded Sourcebook
  40. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222220403
  41. Qualitative Educational Research in Action Doing and Reflecting
  42. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  43. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  44. Case Study Research Design and Methods