Abstract

<roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Background:</b></roman> Although a number of empirical studies have investigated communication challenges during recent years, we still need to discover the most critical challenges that face communication when agile development is geographically distributed. We also need to discover how successful geographically distributed agile development (GDAD) organizations deal with these challenges. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Literature review:</b></roman> Most previous studies reported that the critical challenges facing GDAD communication can be categorized into five themes: differences in cultures, different time zones, different spoken languages, different personal skills, and the efficiency and effectiveness of communication tools used. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Research questions:</b></roman> 1. What are the challenges of communication between GDAD teams? 2. How can the impact of GDAD communication challenges be mitigated? <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Methodology:</b></roman> Data were collected by interviewing 12 members of a three-team organization using distributed agile development. These teams are distributed over three countries; the main team located in Australia, the developers’ team located in China, and the testers’ team located in India. A thematic analysis technique was used to identify communication challenges and practices used to mitigate the effect of these challenges. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Results:</b></roman> Our findings reveal that the five challenges are still critical to GDAD. Moreover, we report a new critical challenge of communication in GDAD, the insufficient documentation provided by distributed teams and members. In addition, we recommend several practices to mitigate the impact of these challenges. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Conclusions:</b></roman> Communication among distributed agile development teams still faces several critical challenges, and the solutions to these challenges provided in recent years have not been sufficient. This fact prompts the need for more research on how the impact of these challenges can be lessened.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2021-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2021.3110396
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (16)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 16 →
  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  6. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  7. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  8. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  9. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  10. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  11. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Also cites 23 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1186/s40411-018-0048-2
  2. 10.4018/jdm.2011100104
  3. 10.1007/s10664-008-9065-9
  4. 10.17705/1CAIS.03615
  5. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2895690
  6. 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106122
  7. 10.1007/978-3-642-20677-1_8
  8. 10.17706/jsw.10.6.681-694
  9. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990389
  10. 10.3991/ijim.v14i11.13269
  11. 10.1016/j.im.2015.08.003
  12. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2953008
  13. 10.1016/j.infsof.2006.01.004
  14. 10.1109/TEM.2009.2013829
  15. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2803685
  16. 10.1177/8756972818798980
  17. 10.1145/2491627.2491642
  18. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976723
  19. 10.1016/j.csi.2016.06.002
  20. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924404
  21. 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.10.008
  22. 10.1007/978-3-531-92052-8_42
  23. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222220403