Taken Under Advisement: Perspectives on Advisory Boards From Across Technical Communication

Lars Soderlund ; John Spartz ; Ryan Weber University of Alabama in Huntsville

Abstract

Research problem: Advisory boards provide an opportunity for technical communication programs to connect consistently with industry practitioners and on-campus stakeholders, and yet few recent studies examine best practices for advisory boards in technical communication programs. Research questions: (1) What is the typical makeup of a technical communication program advisory board? (2) What function do these advisory boards serve? (3) What are the typical successes and challenges of starting and maintaining a technical communication advisory board? (4) What are best practices for starting and maintaining a successful advisory board? (5) What are the similarities and differences in how program administrators and board members perceive the benefits and functions of the board? Literature review: Literature on advisory boards in technical and business communication-and in related fields such as communication, journalism, and marketing-reports that advisory boards are beneficial and effective, though many include caveats or recommendations about ways to improve board function. Methodology: To provide perspectives from both sides of the academy-industry relationship, we conducted 18 semistructured phone, Skype, and in-person interviews with program administrators (n = 10) from a host of nationwide programs and with board members (n = 8) from a single advisory board. Results and discussion: The study finds that the typical advisory board involves a mix of industry, faculty, and student members, with an emphasis on industry members. They advise the program about its curricular concerns, often foster students' academic and professional maturation, and support the program in conflicts with university administration. The typical successes of advisory boards included positive curricular amendment and the recruitment of students for jobs and internships, while characteristic challenges included meeting logistics and board members' concerns regarding the program's response to their advice. Program administrators and board members both perceive a board as useful, but some members expressed concern about the uncertainty of their role and influence. The results suggest that all technical communication programs should seriously consider forming an advisory board based on disciplinary best practices, that existing advisory boards should ensure that they have clarified the board's role for their program, and that stakeholders are aware of and attend to their board members' concerns.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2017-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2016.2635693
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Communication Design Quarterly

References (31) · 4 in this index

  1. 10.1300/J111v44n03_08
  2. Technical communication in the international workplace: Some implications for curriculum…
    Tech Commun
  3. 10.1177/108056990206500407
  4. Corporate advisory boards
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. 10.2190/PMEC16
Show all 31 →
  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical communication practitioner-student interaction: An opportunity for students to…
    Tech Commun
  5. Internships, exit interviews, and advisory boards
    Assessing Communication Education A Handbook for Media Speech and Theatre Educators
  6. 10.1177/107769581106600105
  7. A survey of advisory board ABCs ... advice, balance, and change
    J Mass Commun Edu
  8. The Discovery of Grounded Theory
  9. 10.1080/08832323.2010.480989
  10. InterViews Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing
  11. 10.1177/108056999706000104
  12. 10.1016/0748-5751(89)90048-1
  13. Naturalistic Inquiry
  14. 10.1080/08832323.1988.10117303
  15. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01015.x
  16. 10.1109/FIE.2002.1158119
  17. Advisory boards in technical communication programs and classes
    Tech Writing Teacher
  18. 10.1177/108056999605900315
  19. The academe-industry partnership: What's in it for all of us?
    Tech Commun
  20. Schools with advisory committees are enthusiastic about benefits
    Education Journal
  21. 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:1(7)
  22. Incorporating industrial advisory boards into the assessment process
    Age
  23. 10.1201/9781420017007.fmatt
  24. Technical Communication Quarterly
  25. 10.1177/105065198800200202
  26. Qualitative research in technical communication: Issues of value, identity, and use
    Tech Commun