Community of Practice and Professionalization Perspectives on Technical Communication in Ireland

Yvonne Cleary University of Limerick

Abstract

Research problem: In Ireland, technical communication has developed as an academic and occupational field since the late 20th century. Research on the field in Ireland is limited. Research questions: (1) To what extent do technical communicators in Ireland operate as a community of practice? (2) What steps are Irish technical communicators taking toward professionalization? Literature review: This study uses a theoretical framework that combines symbolic interactionism and communities of practice theories. While traditional professionalization theory uses a structural functionalist approach to the study of occupations, characterizing disciplines as professions depending on whether they meet certain traits (including autonomy, market closure, license to practice, and service orientation), symbolic interactionism prioritizes interactions among individuals. In this sense, it overlaps with the concerns of communities of practice. A community of practice involves a group of people working together, and creating meaning through their interactions. Studying an occupation through this lens foregrounds individual and community identity, and how that is formed and informed by work. Methodology: Mixed methods-a survey, focus groups, and interviews-were used to explore Irish technical communicators' perceptions of aspects of their field: practice, education, value and status, and professional and community structures. Results: The findings indicate that Irish technical communicators exhibit traits of communities of practice (such as joint enterprise and shared repertoires). They also identify with their job title and practice. A key finding is that some Irish technical communicators have a keen appetite for community involvement. This enthusiasm notwithstanding, barriers to professionalization include low visibility of the role in Ireland, limited evidence of professionalizing activity, and the potential for career stagnation.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2016-06-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2016.2561138
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 13 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/03906701.1999.9971301
  2. 10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
  3. 10.1108/13673270310463626
  4. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199275601.003.0003
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
  6. 10.2190/PL1
  7. 10.1177/0268580903018002005
  8. 10.1177/0730888411417565
  9. ‘My way’: Piloting an online focus group
    International Journal of Qualitative Methods  
  10. 10.7208/chicago/9780226516608.001.0001
  11. 10.1002/9781118504871
  12. 10.2190/PL1C7
  13. 10.1002/9781118504871.ch5