Instructional Design for Stem-Based Collaborative, Colocated Classroom Composition

Brad Mehlenbacher North Carolina State University ; Meagan Kittle Autry The Graduate Center, CUNY ; Ashley Rose Kelly University of Waterloo

Abstract

Research problem: Our study focuses on how students collaborate online to produce specific written genres, using particular collaborative technologies to work together productively, and how instructor feedback and student perspectives on collaborative work influence those activities in online classrooms. Research questions: When composing using collaborative web-based writing applications, do students focus primarily on the interface or the text space? What kinds of expectations about collaborative writing do students bring to the interface and text space? To what extent can we characterize students' acknowledgement of a third space, what we have identified as “communicative interaction?” Literature review: Workplace collaboration is important because organizations increasingly demand effective collaborators, team members, and team leaders, and technologies for sharing, cobuilding, and feedback are readily available to support these activities. Student preparation for workplace collaboration is important because students struggle when they are asked to write together, particularly when the collaborative process involves new technologies, and yet knowledge of collaborative writing strategies and experience with collaborative technologies, such as Google Docs, are the very competencies that organizations expect of them. Methodology: Thirteen groups of 3 to 4 technical writing students and science communication students enrolled in online professional writing courses at a major research university wrote feature specifications and reports on the globalization of the sciences, respectively, using Google Docs within Google Drive. Sixteen of 37 students responded to a set of questions asking them to reflect on their experiences working collaboratively, learning new genres, using the collaborative environment, and revising with instructor feedback. Results and conclusions: We found that students struggled most with adapting their already established collaborative strategies grounded in face-to-face learning situations to an online learning environment, where they felt their means of communication and expression were limited. The results suggest that effective collaborative experiences, properly executed, represent a repertoire of competencies that go well beyond only technical considerations, such as being able to effectively assign roles, set milestones, and navigate the numerous tasks and processes of writing as a team. The small number of students and the single instructor with her own particular feedback style limit the study. Future research includes looking at how different feedback styles influence student collaborative writing.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2015-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2016.2517538
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (5)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Also cites 17 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/0098628311411794
  2. 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.002
  3. 10.1017/CBO9780511816819.017
  4. 10.1108/07419051011083181
  5. 10.1119/1.3555501
  6. 10.1177/0170840605051820
  7. 10.1080/13594320444000092
  8. 10.3102/003465430298487
  9. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262013949.001.0001
  10. 10.1145/143457.143468
  11. 10.1145/958160.958177
  12. 10.1017/CBO9780511509605
  13. 10.1016/B978-155860808-5/50012-5
  14. Peer-to-peer recognition of learning in open education
    Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn  
  15. 10.1109/TLT.2010.43
  16. 10.1177/002194360203900102
  17. 10.2307/358761