Instructional Design for Online Learning Environments and the Problem of Collaboration in the Cloud

Brad Mehlenbacher North Carolina State University ; Ashley Rose Kelly University of Waterloo ; Christopher Kampe North Carolina State University ; Meagan Kittle Autry North Carolina State University

Abstract

To investigate how college students understand and use cloud technology for collaborative writing, the authors studied two asynchronous online courses, on science communication and on technical communication. Students worked on a group assignment (3–4 per group) using Google Docs and individually reflected on their experience writing collaboratively. This article explores leadership and how it interacts with team knowledge making and the collaborative writing process. Guidelines are outlined for instructors interested in adopting collaborative, cloud-based assignments, and the tension between providing clear instructional guidance for student teams and allowing teams to embrace the ambiguity and messiness of virtual collaboration are discussed.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2018-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0047281616679112
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. Written Communication
Also cites 43 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1108/LHT-02-2014-0024
  2. 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621
  3. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222270201
  4. 10.1145/505248.505274
  5. 10.1007/s11251-004-7689-8
  6. Chefalas, T., Doran, J., Herger, L. M., Kochut, A., Mastrianni, S., Schulz, C. & Shea, D. G. (2011). Leveragi…
  7. 10.1080/01449290500044049
  8. 10.5465/amr.2011.0206
  9. 10.1023/A:1022596100142
  10. de Souza C. R. B., Redmiles D., Dourish P. (2003) “Breaking the code,” moving between private and public work…
  11. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005
  12. 10.1109/47.544575
  13. 10.1093/oso/9780195117509.001.0001
  14. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.087
  15. Hart-Davidson, W., Spinuzzi, C. & Zachry, M. (2006). Visualizing writing activity as knowledge work: Challeng…
  16. Hart-Davidson, W., Zachry, M. & Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Activity streams: Building context to coordinate writing…
  17. 10.7551/mitpress/2464.003.0007
  18. 10.2190/5H41-K8VU-NRFJ-PDYK
  19. 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.002
  20. 10.7551/mitpress/2464.003.0010
  21. 10.1080/0307507042000287230
  22. 10.1287/orsc.11.5.473.15200
  23. Mehlenbacher, B., Kittle Autry, M. & Kelly, A. R. (2015). Instructional design for STEM-based collaborative, …
  24. Mehlenbacher, B. (2010). Instruction and technology: Designs for everyday learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  25. 10.2307/375964
  26. 10.1518/155723410X12849346788822
  27. 10.1023/A:1015241914483
  28. Neuwirth, C. M., Kaufer, D. S., Chandhok, R. & Morris, J. H. (1990). Issues in the design of computer support…
  29. Noble, D. F. (1998). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. First Monday, 3(1). Retrieved…
  30. 10.1108/JBS-10-2012-0061
  31. 10.1021/ed200708p
  32. 10.1080/14719037.2011.589617
  33. 10.1080/713688409
  34. 10.1023/A:1008636321493
  35. Ullrich, C., Borau, K., Luo, H., Tan, X., Shen, L. & Shen, R. (2008). Why Web 2.0 is good for learning and fo…
  36. 10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.17
  37. 10.3233/HSM-2000-19308
    Human Systems Management  
  38. 10.1080/14636310303143
  39. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03025.x
  40. 10.1023/A:1012976702296
  41. 10.1109/TPC.2013.2287571
  42. 10.1080/13594320444000092
  43. 10.1177/0170840605051820
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →