Too Early, Too Bad: Uncovering and Understanding the Initial Participation Paradox in Technology-Mediated Learning Teams

Elizabeth Koh; John Lim

doi:10.1109/tpc.2011.2172122

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2012

Too Early, Too Bad: Uncovering and Understanding the Initial Participation Paradox in Technology-Mediated Learning Teams

Elizabeth Koh National University of Singapore ; John Lim National University of Singapore

Abstract

Research Problem: Time is of the essence in technology-mediated teams. However, research has been inconclusive about the impact of team participation on outcomes. A possible reason can be found in the temporal dimension; particularly, we refer to the time points examined in relation to the entirety of the period. Indeed, we can find research attention on initial participation (IP) in fields such as social psychology. IP refers to the contributions of team members during the earlier half of the team's lifespan. Comparable efforts are in want in information systems contexts where the relevancy and saliency of IP is no less. Research Questions: Does IP affect outcomes of technology-mediated teams? Do team size and task type affect IP in technology-mediated teams? Literature Review: Based on a review of literature that includes group development, information overload, and integrative complexity, we discover an IP paradox. More intense IP, in terms of amount and equality, could decrease outcomes, namely, task performance, team learning, and outcome satisfaction. Moreover, two cornerstone boundary conditions of teamwork, team size and task type, could affect IP. Methodology: A quantitative field experiment with 49 technology-mediated learning teams that involved 245 participants was conducted. These teams used a wiki to complete a task in a course in higher education. Data were collected from a pretest survey, posttest survey, and electronic records of the wiki (editcount and wordcount). Qualitative data from participants were also sought for the sake of triangulation. The data were analyzed using partial least squares. Results and Discussion: The results show that higher IP amount and equality decreased task performance and outcome satisfaction as predicted. However, higher IP amount did not significantly affect team learning although this was significant in the hypothesized direction for IP equality. As for team size, larger team sizes increased IP amount but lowered IP equality. Task type did not affect IP amount and contrary to our prediction, multiple solution tasks instead of single solution tasks decreased IP equality. Nevertheless, the findings support the notion that higher IP leads to detrimental outcomes. This suggests the importance of coordination mechanisms in the initial period especially in time-limited teams. For instance, knowledge leaders and facilitators can step up to organize and reduce information overload during the initial period to ensure an easier time synthesizing in the later period and better task performance. The current work was limited in terms of using only objective data for participation amount and equality. Future research could involve a combination of perceptual and objective data as well as other types of participation constructs, such as task related, norms and rules, and socioemotional acts for a richer insight into the IP paradox.

Journal: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published: 2012-03-01
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2011.2172122
CompPile
Open Access: Closed
Topics: affect and writing book reviews
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

Menagarishvili et al. (2024)

Getting it Wrong: Student Estimations of Time and the Number of Drafts in Linke…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Fuller et al. (2016)

Longitudinal Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication Anxiety on Interaction …

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (97) · 7 in this index

10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00042-7

↗
10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.004

↗
10.2307/2393428

↗
10.2307/259377

↗
10.1037/0021-9010.64.2.151

↗

Show all 97 →

10.1016/0749-5978(86)90014-2

↗
Hartwick et al. (2001)

Communication as a dimension of user participation

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.003

↗
10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009

↗
10.2307/3069440

↗
10.2307/2786161

↗
massey (2003)

Because time matters: Temporal coordination in global virtual project teams

J Manage Inf Syst ↗
maher (1995)

Attribution Theory An Organizational Perspective
10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.001

↗
keyton (2006)

Communicating in Groups Building Relationships for Group Effectiveness
10.1037/h0022100

↗
10.2307/3069330

↗
10.2307/258605

↗
10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00074-X

↗
10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00188.x

↗
walther (2002)

Handbook of Interpersonal Communication
10.1109/GLOCOM.1996.591948

↗
picciano (2002)

Beyong student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online…

Asynchronous Learning Networks
berdahl (1995)

Equality of participation and influence in groups: The effects of communication medium an…

Comput Supported Coop Work ↗
fitze (2006)

Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face and written electronic conferences

Language Learning & Technology
10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.003

↗
10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1375

↗
amichai-hamburger (2003)

10.1057/9780230288829_5

Misbehaviour and Dysfunctional Attitudes in Organizations ↗
10.1016/j.infsof.2005.03.006

↗
cortesi (2001)

The relation of communication channel and task on group composition participation and performance in virtual organizations
dennis (2003)

The adoption and use of GSS in project teams: Toward more participative processes and outcomes

MIS Quart ↗
10.1177/009365092019001003

↗
Ocker (2005)

Influences on Creativity in Asynchronous Virtual Teams: A Qualitative Analysis …

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.2307/256496

↗
10.2307/30040680

↗
10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00277.x

↗
10.1080/0158791042000212477

↗
10.1177/104649648801900101

↗
10.1177/1046496491222001

↗
10.1016/j.dss.2006.12.013

↗
Lowry et al. (2003)

Using internet-based, distributed collaborative writing tools to improve coordi…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.2307/249476

↗
10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.006

↗
joinson (1998)

Psychology and the Internet Intrapersonal Interpersonal and Transpersonal Implications
fjermestdad (1998)

An assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results

J Manage Inf Syst ↗
10.2753/MIS0742-1222230308

↗
10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492

↗
10.1016/j.infoandorg.2003.11.001

↗
10.2307/3150499

↗
10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1071

↗
10.1207/S1532768XJEPC1202_03

↗
10.3102/00346543064001001

↗
easley (2003)

Relating collaborative technology use to teamwork quality and performance: An empirical a…

J Manage Inf Syst ↗
10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681

↗
10.2307/256377

↗
10.1037/h0023897

↗
parker (2007)

Wiki as a teaching tool

Interdisciplinary J Knowledge and Learning Objects
koh (2009)

Predicting successful global online group projects from online discussion

Proc Hawaii Int Conf Syst Sci
10.1080/01972240490507974

↗
Robert et al. (2005)

Paradox of Richness: A Cognitive Model of Media Choice

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.1287/isre.1040.0023

↗
10.1145/289444.289500

↗
10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

↗
Flammia et al. (2010)

Leadership Roles, Socioemotional Communication Strategies, and Technology Use o…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
jiang (2004)

Communication participation and performance in distributed groups
vygotsky (1978)

Mind in Society
10.1145/1341971.1341977

↗
10.1080/15391523.2005.10782457

↗
mejias (1997)

Consensus and perceived satisfaction levels: A Cross-cultural Comparison of GSS and non-G…

J Manage Inf Syst ↗
10.1287/orsc.1040.0080

↗
10.1037/a0013773

↗
10.1080/00220670009598748

↗
Bradner et al. (2005)

Team Size and Technology Fit: Participation, Awareness,and Rapport in Distribut…

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00036-6

↗
nunnally (1978)

Psychometric Theory
cecez-kecmanovic (2008)

Towards a communicative model of collaborative web-mediated learning

Australian J Educ Technol
10.1177/0894439309332312

↗
gris (2000)

Information overload: Addressing the productivity paradox in face-to-face electronic meetings

J Manage Inf Syst ↗
10.1287/isre.1050.0051

↗
10.1145/3894.3895

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511527937.028

↗
10.1016/j.compedu.2003.10.004

↗
dennis (2001)

Investigating the moderators of the group support systems use with meta-analysis

J Manage Inf Syst ↗
10.1177/1046496406294322

↗
10.1016/0030-5073(80)90027-6

↗
10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.005

↗
10.2307/249763

↗
10.1108/13527590510617774

↗
howell (2007)

Statistical Methods for Psychology
burke (2001)

Media effects on the development of cohesion and process satisfaction in computer-support…

Inf Technol People ↗
chin (1998)

Modern Methods for Business Research
10.1287/mnsc.49.3.273.12736

↗
fornell (1982)

A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis Methods
bliese (2000)

Multilevel Theory Research and Methods in Organizations
10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.339

↗
Gallivan et al. (2005)

A framework for analyzing levels of analysis issues in studies of e-collaboration

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Too Early, Too Bad: Uncovering and Understanding the Initial Participation Paradox in Technology-Mediated Learning Teams

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

References (97) · 7 in this index

Related Articles