Too Early, Too Bad: Uncovering and Understanding the Initial Participation Paradox in Technology-Mediated Learning Teams

Elizabeth Koh National University of Singapore ; John Lim National University of Singapore

Abstract

Research Problem: Time is of the essence in technology-mediated teams. However, research has been inconclusive about the impact of team participation on outcomes. A possible reason can be found in the temporal dimension; particularly, we refer to the time points examined in relation to the entirety of the period. Indeed, we can find research attention on initial participation (IP) in fields such as social psychology. IP refers to the contributions of team members during the earlier half of the team's lifespan. Comparable efforts are in want in information systems contexts where the relevancy and saliency of IP is no less. Research Questions: Does IP affect outcomes of technology-mediated teams? Do team size and task type affect IP in technology-mediated teams? Literature Review: Based on a review of literature that includes group development, information overload, and integrative complexity, we discover an IP paradox. More intense IP, in terms of amount and equality, could decrease outcomes, namely, task performance, team learning, and outcome satisfaction. Moreover, two cornerstone boundary conditions of teamwork, team size and task type, could affect IP. Methodology: A quantitative field experiment with 49 technology-mediated learning teams that involved 245 participants was conducted. These teams used a wiki to complete a task in a course in higher education. Data were collected from a pretest survey, posttest survey, and electronic records of the wiki (editcount and wordcount). Qualitative data from participants were also sought for the sake of triangulation. The data were analyzed using partial least squares. Results and Discussion: The results show that higher IP amount and equality decreased task performance and outcome satisfaction as predicted. However, higher IP amount did not significantly affect team learning although this was significant in the hypothesized direction for IP equality. As for team size, larger team sizes increased IP amount but lowered IP equality. Task type did not affect IP amount and contrary to our prediction, multiple solution tasks instead of single solution tasks decreased IP equality. Nevertheless, the findings support the notion that higher IP leads to detrimental outcomes. This suggests the importance of coordination mechanisms in the initial period especially in time-limited teams. For instance, knowledge leaders and facilitators can step up to organize and reduce information overload during the initial period to ensure an easier time synthesizing in the later period and better task performance. The current work was limited in terms of using only objective data for participation amount and equality. Future research could involve a combination of perceptual and objective data as well as other types of participation constructs, such as task related, norms and rules, and socioemotional acts for a richer insight into the IP paradox.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2012-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2011.2172122
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (7)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 7 →
  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Also cites 73 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00042-7
  2. 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.004
  3. 10.2307/2393428
  4. 10.2307/259377
  5. 10.1037/0021-9010.64.2.151
  6. 10.1016/0749-5978(86)90014-2
  7. 10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.003
  8. 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009
  9. 10.2307/3069440
  10. 10.2307/2786161
  11. Because time matters: Temporal coordination in global virtual project teams
    J Manage Inf Syst  
  12. 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.001
  13. 10.1037/h0022100
  14. 10.2307/3069330
  15. 10.2307/258605
  16. 10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00074-X
  17. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00188.x
  18. 10.1109/GLOCOM.1996.591948
  19. Equality of participation and influence in groups: The effects of communication medium an…
    Comput Supported Coop Work  
  20. 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.003
  21. 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1375
  22. 10.1057/9780230288829_5
    Misbehaviour and Dysfunctional Attitudes in Organizations  
  23. 10.1016/j.infsof.2005.03.006
  24. The adoption and use of GSS in project teams: Toward more participative processes and outcomes
    MIS Quart  
  25. 10.1177/009365092019001003
  26. 10.2307/256496
  27. 10.2307/30040680
  28. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00277.x
  29. 10.1080/0158791042000212477
  30. 10.1177/104649648801900101
  31. 10.1177/1046496491222001
  32. 10.1016/j.dss.2006.12.013
  33. 10.2307/249476
  34. 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.006
  35. An assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results
    J Manage Inf Syst  
  36. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222230308
  37. 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492
  38. 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2003.11.001
  39. 10.2307/3150499
  40. 10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1071
  41. 10.1207/S1532768XJEPC1202_03
  42. 10.3102/00346543064001001
  43. Relating collaborative technology use to teamwork quality and performance: An empirical a…
    J Manage Inf Syst  
  44. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681
  45. 10.2307/256377
  46. 10.1037/h0023897
  47. 10.1080/01972240490507974
  48. 10.1287/isre.1040.0023
  49. 10.1145/289444.289500
  50. 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
  51. 10.1145/1341971.1341977
  52. 10.1080/15391523.2005.10782457
  53. Consensus and perceived satisfaction levels: A Cross-cultural Comparison of GSS and non-G…
    J Manage Inf Syst  
  54. 10.1287/orsc.1040.0080
  55. 10.1037/a0013773
  56. 10.1080/00220670009598748
  57. 10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00036-6
  58. 10.1177/0894439309332312
  59. Information overload: Addressing the productivity paradox in face-to-face electronic meetings
    J Manage Inf Syst  
  60. 10.1287/isre.1050.0051
  61. 10.1145/3894.3895
  62. 10.1017/CBO9780511527937.028
  63. 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.10.004
  64. Investigating the moderators of the group support systems use with meta-analysis
    J Manage Inf Syst  
  65. 10.1177/1046496406294322
  66. 10.1016/0030-5073(80)90027-6
  67. 10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.005
  68. 10.2307/249763
  69. 10.1108/13527590510617774
  70. Media effects on the development of cohesion and process satisfaction in computer-support…
    Inf Technol People  
  71. 10.1287/mnsc.49.3.273.12736
  72. 10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.339
  73. 10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85