Abstract

There has been a proliferation of competing explanations regarding the inconsistent results reported by the e-collaboration literature since its inception. This study advances another possible explanation by investigating the range of multilevel issues that can be encountered in research on the use of synchronous or asynchronous group support systems. We introduce concepts of levels of analysis from the management literature and then examine all empirical studies of e-collaboration from seven information systems journals for the period 1999-2003. We identified a total of 54 studies of e-collaboration in these journals, and after excluding 18 nonconforming studies - those that were primarily conceptual, qualitative, or exploratory only-we analyzed the levels of analysis issues in the remaining 36 empirical studies. Based on our analysis and classification of these studies into six different clusters according to their levels of analysis, we found that a majority of these studies contain one or more problems of levels incongruence that cast doubts on the validity of their results. It is indeed possible that these methodological problems are in part responsible for the inconsistent results reported in this literature, especially since researchers' frequent decisions to analyze data at the individual level - even when the theory was formulated at the group level and when the research setting featured individuals working in groups -may very well have artificially inflated the authors' chances of finding statistically significant results. Based on our discussion of levels of analysis concepts, we hope to provide guidance to empirical researchers who study e-ollaboration.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2005-01-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2005.843301
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (1)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Also cites 94 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.7312/luca94612
  2. 10.1080/07421222.2000.11518272
  3. 10.1145/163298.163309
  4. 10.1093/oso/9780195068061.003.0004
  5. 10.1287/mnsc.42.4.541
  6. 10.1257/jep.14.4.23
  7. 10.1145/641865.641866
  8. 10.2307/249475
  9. 10.1287/isre.10.2.167
  10. 10.1287/isre.6.1.3
  11. 10.1162/003355302753399526
  12. 10.1287/isre.10.2.110
  13. 10.2307/3250972
  14. 10.1287/mnsc.34.5.583
  15. 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045728
  16. 10.2307/3250928
  17. 10.2307/2392578
  18. 10.2307/258703
  19. 10.5465/AMR.1999.1893934
  20. 10.2307/258559
  21. 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045696
  22. 10.1080/07421222.1998.11518216
  23. 10.1080/07421222.2000.11045657
  24. 10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
  25. 10.2307/249668
  26. 10.1287/isre.8.4.342
  27. 10.1287/isre.13.1.91.93
  28. 10.1023/A:1008765029795
  29. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.3
  30. 10.1037/0021-9010.77.2.161
  31. 10.2307/259086
  32. 10.1037/0021-9010.67.2.219
  33. 10.1037//0021-9010.69.1.85
  34. 10.1177/014920639802400202
  35. 10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00105-9
  36. 10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306
  37. 10.1177/014920630202800305
  38. 10.2307/259082
  39. 10.2307/4132339
  40. 10.1287/isre.10.2.186
  41. 10.1080/07421222.2000.11045630
  42. 10.1287/isre.12.3.304.9708
  43. 10.1287/isre.11.1.61.11783
  44. 10.2307/30036518
  45. Should we wait? Network externalities, compatibility, and electronic billing adoption
    J. Manage. Inform. Syst.  
  46. 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045721
  47. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000375
  48. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000455
  49. 10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00049-4
  50. 10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00042-1
  51. 10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00132-X
  52. A technology transition model derived from field investigation of GSS use
    J. Manage. Inform. Syst.  
  53. Collaboration engineering with thinklets to pursue sustained success with group support systems
    J. Manage. Inform. Syst.  
  54. 10.2307/3250948
  55. 10.2307/3250930
  56. Facilitating interorganizational learning with information technology
    J. Manage. Inform. Syst.  
  57. 10.1080/07421222.1998.11518218
  58. 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045742
  59. 10.2307/3250979
  60. 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045768
  61. 10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00124-0
  62. 10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00072-6
  63. 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045691
  64. 10.2307/30036538
  65. 10.2307/3250922
  66. 10.1080/07421222.2000.11045647
  67. 10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00009-X
  68. 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045754
  69. 10.1080/07421222.1999.11518238
  70. 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045697
  71. 10.1287/isre.11.4.386.11874
  72. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000335
  73. 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2001.00103.x
  74. 10.2307/249489
  75. 10.1080/07421222.1999.11518260
  76. 10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00143-9
  77. 10.1287/isre.12.3.322.9710
  78. Stimulating thinking: Cultivating better decisions with groupware through categorization
    J. Manage. Inform. Syst.  
  79. 10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00028-7
  80. 10.1080/10864415.2003.11044295
  81. 10.2307/3250989
  82. 10.1287/isre.13.4.404.72
  83. 10.2307/249411
  84. The adoption and use of GSS in project teams: Toward more participative processes and outcomes
    MIS Quart.  
  85. Identification of comment authorship in anonymous group support systems
    J. Manage. Inform. Syst.  
  86. An examination of the impact of stimuli type and GSS structure on creativity: Brainstormi…
    J. Manage. Inform. Syst.  
  87. Individual differences and relative advantage: The case of GSS
    Decision Support Syst.  
  88. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000421
  89. 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045731
  90. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000358
  91. 10.1080/07421222.1999.11518223
  92. 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045750
  93. 10.1287/isre.13.1.70.92
  94. 10.1046/j.1365-2575.1999.00065.x