A Framework for Analyzing Levels of AnalysisIssues in Studies of E-Collaboration
Abstract
There has been a proliferation of competing explanations regarding the inconsistent results reported by the e-collaboration literature since its inception. This study advances another possible explanation by investigating the range of multilevel issues that can be encountered in research on the use of synchronous or asynchronous group support systems. We introduce concepts of levels of analysis from the management literature and then examine all empirical studies of e-collaboration from seven information systems journals for the period 1999-2003. We identified a total of 54 studies of e-collaboration in these journals, and after excluding 18 nonconforming studies - those that were primarily conceptual, qualitative, or exploratory only-we analyzed the levels of analysis issues in the remaining 36 empirical studies. Based on our analysis and classification of these studies into six different clusters according to their levels of analysis, we found that a majority of these studies contain one or more problems of levels incongruence that cast doubts on the validity of their results. It is indeed possible that these methodological problems are in part responsible for the inconsistent results reported in this literature, especially since researchers' frequent decisions to analyze data at the individual level - even when the theory was formulated at the group level and when the research setting featured individuals working in groups -may very well have artificially inflated the authors' chances of finding statistically significant results. Based on our discussion of levels of analysis concepts, we hope to provide guidance to empirical researchers who study e-ollaboration.
- Journal
- IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
- Published
- 2005-03-01
- DOI
- 10.1109/tpc.2004.843301
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Jan 2005M.J. Gallivan; R. Benunan-Fich
-
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2026Bridging the Gap: A Comparative Study of Students’ and LSPs’ Perceptions of Translation Internships ↗Shuang Liu
-
Computers and Composition Dec 2025Supporting online learning for diverse elementary students: A community of inquiry approach to collaborative multimodal composing—processes, products, and perspectives ↗Amanda Yoshiko Shimizu; Jill Santos
-
Computers and Composition Sep 2025When collaborating turns into dishonesty: A data-driven heuristic comparing human and AI collaborators ↗John R. Gallagher; Kyle Wagner; Jordan Canzonetta
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Sep 2025Surabhi Koul; Sahil Singh Jasrotia