Abstract

The paper argues for using specialized collaborative writing (CW) tools to improve the results of distributed, Internet-based writing teams. The key features of collaborative tools that support enhanced coordination and group awareness are compared to existing writing tools. The first Internet-based CW tool, Collaboratus, is introduced, and its group features are compared with those of Microsoft Word. Next, theoretical propositions, hypotheses, and constructs are formulated to predict outcomes of distributed groups that use CW tools. A four-week-long synchronous-distributed experiment then compares the outcomes of Collaboratus and Word groups. Innovative measures show that Collaboratus groups generally experience better outcomes than Word groups, in terms of productivity, document quality, relationships, and communication, but not in terms of satisfaction. The results buttress the conclusion that Internet-based CW teams can benefit from specialized collaborative technologies that provide enhanced coordination, group awareness, and CW activity support.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2003-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2003.819640
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 7 →
  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 48 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/105065198700100206
  2. 10.2190/CWI
  3. 10.1145/158011.158239
  4. 10.1287/isre.5.2.110
  5. 10.7551/mitpress/2464.003.0007
  6. 10.1016/s0747-5632(01)00040-1
  7. 10.1109/IPCC.1998.722104
  8. 10.1023/A:1008687926851
  9. 10.1145/289444.289501
  10. 10.1007/978-94-011-0349-7_7
  11. 10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00119-7
  12. 10.1145/99977.99987
  13. 10.1145/99332.99354
  14. 10.1207/s15327051hci0301_3
  15. 10.1145/169059.169312
  16. 10.1109/HICSS.1999.772739
  17. 10.1023/A:1008636321493
  18. 10.1007/978-1-4471-2007-0_10
  19. 10.1145/62266.62282
  20. 10.1080/10919399409540222
  21. 10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.137
  22. 10.1177/009365093020002004
  23. 10.1177/002194369403100102
  24. 10.1145/159764.159763
  25. 10.2307/248853
  26. 10.2190/1JPE-PPKN-LQ6P-46F2
  27. 10.1080/07421222.1998.11518217
  28. 10.1177/1046496493243003
  29. 10.4324/9781315807645-19
  30. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00104.x
  31. 10.1007/BF00823362
  32. 10.1207/s15327051hci0602_2
  33. 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90047-B
  34. 10.1207/s15327051hci1203_1
  35. 10.1016/0167-9236(95)00007-0
  36. 10.1080/07421222.1993.11518011
  37. 10.1109/HICSS.1996.493180
  38. 10.1080/03637759909376462
  39. The impact of face-to-face technology on group writing
  40. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1974.tb00631.x
  41. 10.1007/978-1-4471-2007-0_8
  42. 10.1145/103731.103735
  43. 10.1145/143457.143538
  44. 10.1145/194313.194322
  45. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199702)48:2<157::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-X
  46. 10.1109/2.707620
  47. 10.1080/07421222.1996.11518138
  48. 10.1016/0167-9236(94)90009-4