Abstract

This paper summarizes three field experiments involving distributed collaborative writing in traditional educational settings creating a hybrid form of distributed education. One finding shows that specialized collaborative tools allowed for parallel work, group awareness, and coordination, providing substantial advantages over traditional word processors in distributed collaborative writing. However, it was also found that advanced collaborative writing tools alone did not provide optimal results in distributed collaborative writing groups; such groups also needed high levels of process structure, which can be delivered through carefully constructed scripts. Moreover, it was found that introducing face-to-face meetings in distributed collaborative writing work did not necessarily provide advantages over work that was performed in all-distributed settings. Given these findings, this paper concludes by discussing the contributions, implications, limitations, and future research possibilities for hybrid distributed education are discussed.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2004-09-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2004.833689
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Cites in this index (9)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Show all 9 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 51 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/108056999005300308
  2. 10.4324/9781003106760-3
  3. 10.1007/978-1-4471-2007-0_6
  4. 10.1145/259963.260476
  5. 10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00119-7
  6. A taxonomy of collaborative writing to improve empirical research, writing practice, and …
    J. Bus. Commun.  
  7. 10.1177/0893318990003004006
  8. 10.1177/002194360003700104
  9. 10.1287/isre.5.2.110
  10. 10.2190/1JPE-PPKN-LQ6P-46F2
  11. 10.1145/159764.159763
  12. 10.2190/CWI
  13. 10.1145/169059.169312
  14. 10.1207/s15327051hci0301_3
  15. 10.1080/07421222.1996.11518138
  16. 10.1177/002194369403100102
  17. 10.1080/07421222.1998.11518217
  18. 10.1177/1046496493243003
  19. 10.1007/978-94-011-0349-7_7
  20. 10.1145/143457.143468
  21. 10.1109/HICSS.2002.993860
  22. 10.1080/03637759909376462
  23. 10.2139/ssrn.666221
  24. 10.2307/255641
  25. 10.1145/99977.99987
  26. 10.7551/mitpress/2464.003.0007
  27. 10.1080/07421222.1998.11518216
  28. 10.1037/h0041372
  29. 10.1080/10919399109540155
  30. 10.1080/07421222.1993.11518005
  31. 10.1080/07421222.1991.11517928
  32. 10.1145/143457.143466
  33. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000335
  34. Interactivity and communication processes in interpersonal and mediated interaction
    J. Commun.  
  35. 10.1080/03637758709390214
  36. 10.1177/0893318987001002003
  37. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1990.tb00232.x
  38. 10.1080/03637757809375951
  39. 10.2139/ssrn.666204
  40. 10.1145/358916.359003
  41. 10.1016/s0747-5632(01)00040-1
  42. 10.1023/A:1008636321493
  43. 10.1109/HICSS.1999.772739
  44. 10.1109/HICSS.1999.772737
  45. 10.1207/s15327051hci0704_2
  46. 10.1002/ejsp.2420030402
  47. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1974.tb00631.x
  48. 10.1177/104649648701800206
  49. 10.1109/HICSS.1996.493180
  50. 10.1109/HICSS.1993.284178
  51. 10.1109/21.297795