IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Mar 1987
To see or not to see … the other rhetoric
Abstract
Verbal and written language has become so dominant that it virtually excludes the perceptual languages from the thought process. However, Musil [1], in keeping with his thesis on the “other condition,” posits that visual and verbal statements must be kept in mind in a kind of complementary condition, if valid communication is to occur. But is visible language currently being used properly as an integral part of communication? Is it a means for addressing falling literacy levels? Can it be used as a tool to assist the programming function? To see, or not to see: that is the question.
- Journal
- IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
- Published
- 1987-03-01
- DOI
- 10.1109/tpc.1987.6449113
- CompPile
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Written Communication May 2026Rebecca Lorimer Leonard; Angela Rounsaville
-
Communication Design Quarterly Mar 2026Review of "Augmentation Technologies and Artificial Intelligence in Technical Communication: Designing Ethical Futures by Ann Hill Duin and Isabel Pedersen," Duin, A. H., & Pedersen, I. (2023). Augmentation technologies and artificial intelligence in technical communication: Designing ethical futures. Routledge. ↗Cornelius Fuumaale Suom-Kogle
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Feb 2026Heidi Schultz
-
Reflections: A Journal of Community-Engaged Writing and Rhetoric Feb 2026Danielle Bacibianco
-
College Composition and Communication Feb 2026Holly Hassel; Kate L. Pantelides