IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Dec 1985
Evaluating readability
Alinda Drury
Rochester Institute of Technology
Abstract
Readability formulas have drawbacks when used with persons who are not fluent in English. Most such formulas depend upon the assumptions that longer words and longer sentences are more difficult than those which are not. The author asserts that these assumptions do not hold, and that there are other factors which contribute to relative difficulty when dealing with nonfluent readers. Vocabulary, sentence structure, text organization, and presentation, factors affecting readability that can be controlled by the writer, are discussed.
- Journal
- IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
- Published
- 1985-12-01
- DOI
- 10.1109/tpc.1985.6448840
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026Frederike Strahl; Jörg Kilian; Jens Möller
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026How do L2 writing subskills interact hierarchically? Insights from diagnostic classification models ↗Farshad Effatpanah; Hamdollah Ravand; Mahmoud Abdi Tabari; Yi-Hsin Chen; Olga Kunina-Habenicht
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026Pursuing fair writing assessment: Halo effects in primary school foreign language writing in grade six ↗Ruth Trüb; Julian Lohmann; Jens Möller; Stefan D. Keller
-
Res Rhetorica Jan 2026Review/Recenzja: Nancy Organ. 2024. Data Visualization for People of All Ages. Oxon: CRC Press; and Jen Christiansen. 2023. Building Science Graphics: An Illustrated Guide to Communicating Science Through Diagrams and Visualizations. Oxon: CRC Press ↗Ewa Modrzejewska
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Jan 2026Andres Guillermo Covilla-Martinez