Abstract
When reviewing someone else's document, the reviewer is supposed to help the writer achieve the major objective of the paper, i.e., to communicate effectively with the reader. This paper provides guidelines that enable a reviewer to make a positive contribution by raising questions that lead the author. Most of the paper is concerned with measuring readability and style with minor emphasis on grammar.
- Journal
- IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
- Published
- 1983-03-01
- DOI
- 10.1109/tpc.1983.6448655
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Res Rhetorica Jan 2026Review/Recenzja: Nancy Organ. 2024. Data Visualization for People of All Ages. Oxon: CRC Press; and Jen Christiansen. 2023. Building Science Graphics: An Illustrated Guide to Communicating Science Through Diagrams and Visualizations. Oxon: CRC Press ↗Ewa Modrzejewska
-
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Sep 2025Navigating English Grammar: A Guide to Analyzing Real Language, 2nd ed.: Anne Lobeck and Kristin Denham: [Book Review] ↗Bonnie Denmark
-
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Sep 2024Belén Labrador; Noelia Ramón
-
The Peer Review Sep 2024Alexis Stewart
-
Pedagogy Apr 2024modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism feminist rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy creative writing teacher development collaborative writing assessment technical communication professional writing grammar and mechanics literacy studies gender and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter