Conceptualizing Dialogic Literary Argumentation: Inviting Students to Take a Turn in Important Conversations

Written Communication Apr 2023

Conceptualizing Dialogic Literary Argumentation: Inviting Students to Take a Turn in Important Conversations

Jennifer VanDerHeide Michigan State University ; George E. Newell The Ohio State University ; Allison Wynhoff Olsen Montana State University

Abstract

Although authors often create literary texts in order to comment on issues of personhood and human relationships, reading and writing about literary texts in schools is often focused on close analysis of literary elements or exploration of one’s own experience with the text. Thus, students’ written arguments about literature typically do little work in the world toward understanding the human condition. In response, we argue for a theoretical and instructional framework of reading and writing about literature called Dialogic Literary Argumentation. Dialogic literary argumentation asks students and teachers to engage in reading, dialogue, and argumentative writing about how they and others make meaning out of literary texts, what the meaning says about what it means to be human together, and how we might act in and on the worlds in which we live. In this article, we explicate the various elements of this theoretical framework that situates the student’s literary argument within their own cognitive processes, social interactions in classroom events, and broader sociocultural contexts. Students’ composed arguments draw on multiple texts (the literary text, others in and beyond the classroom, their own experiences, the literary discipline, and the world), which are mediated by various classroom dialogues, scaffolds, and supports.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2023-04-01
DOI: 10.1177/07410883221148680
Open Access: Closed
Topics: argument

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

Autry et al. (2024)

Annotated Bibliography of Research in the Teaching of English

Research in the Teaching of English
Ferretti et al. (2023)

Perspectives about Disciplinary Argumentation in the Era of Post-truth: Introdu…

Written Communication

Cites in this index (4)

Johnson (2018)

Where Do We Go from Here? Toward a Critical Race English Education

Research in the Teaching of English
Olsen et al. (2018)

Examining Intertextual Connections in Written Arguments: A Study of Student Wri…

Written Communication
DeStigter (2015)

On the Ascendance of Argument: A Critique of the Assumptions of Academe’s Domin…

Research in the Teaching of English
Street (2005)

AT LAST: Recent Applications of New Literacy Studies in Educational Contexts

Research in the Teaching of English

Also cites 25 works outside this index ↓

10.7560/704114

↗
10.1177/016146819809900610

↗
10.1080/10862960009548075

↗
10.2307/747928

↗
10.4324/9780429424687

↗
10.1002/jaal.938

↗
10.1525/9780520340664

↗
10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741

↗
10.1111/j.1460-2466.1980.tb01778.x

↗
10.1080/09500780408666877

↗
10.1177/0956797611402512

↗
10.1080/23735082.2015.994254

↗
10.1080/10573560903120656

↗
10.1002/jaal.701

↗
10.1177/01614681211058971

↗
10.4324/9781315780498

↗
10.1177/1086296X15568926

↗
10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001

↗
10.5195/dpj.2022.459

↗
10.1002/sce.20421

↗
10.4324/9780429286612

↗
10.1080/10508406.2015.1124040

↗
10.1080/1358684X.2012.704582

↗
10.1002/rrq.196

↗
VanDerHeide J. (2021)

10.58680/ej202131233

English Journal ↗

CrossRef global citation count: 12 View in citation network →