The Relationship Between Students’ Writing Process, Text Quality, and Thought Process Quality in 11th-Grade History and Philosophy Assignments

Lieke Holdinga Amsterdam University of the Arts ; Tanja Janssen Amsterdam University of the Arts ; Gert Rijlaarsdam Amsterdam University of the Arts

Abstract

Source-based writing is a common but difficult task in history and philosophy. Students are usually taught how to write a good text in language classes. However, it is also important to address discipline-specificity in writing, a topic likely to be taught by content teachers. In order to design discipline-specific writing instruction, research needs to identify which reading and writing activities during the source-based writing process affect students’ thought process quality and text quality, as assessed by content teachers. We conducted a think-aloud study with 15 (11th grade) students who performed two source-based writing assignments, each representative of its discipline. From the data, we derived 11 activities, which we analyzed for duration, frequency, and time of occurrence. Results showed that the disciplines required different approaches to writing. For philosophy, the writing process was dominant and influenced quality, leading us to conclude that philosophical thinking and writing are intertwined. For history, the planning process appeared to be paramount, but it influenced text quality only and not the quality of the thought process. In other words, historical thinking and writing appear to be separate processes. Our findings can be used to develop strategy instruction that reinforces better writing, adapted to discipline-specific writing processes.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2021-10-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883211028853
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (62) · 7 in this index

  1. Applebee A. N. (1984). Writing and reasoning. Review of Educational Research, 54(4), 577-596. https://doi.org…
  2. Philosophy of the Social Sciences
  3. The psychology of written composition
  4. Berger R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Q…
  5. Bisra K., Liu Q., Nesbit J. C., Salimi F., Winne P. H. (2018). Inducing self-explanation: A meta-analysis. Ed…
Show all 62 →
  1. Brante E., Strømsø H. I. (2018). Sourcing in text comprehension: A review of interventions targeting sourcing…
  2. Bråten I., Strømsø H. I. (2011). Measuring strategic processing when students read multiple texts. Metacognit…
  3. Breetvelt I., Van den Bergh H., Rijlaarsdam G. (1994). Relations between writing processes and text quality: …
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Advances in instructional psychology
  6. College voor Toetsen en Examens. (2018). Examen geschiedenis vwo 2018-I [History exam 2018-I]. https://www.ex…
  7. Concepción D. W. (2004). Reading philosophy with background knowledge and metacognition. Teaching Philosophy,…
  8. Journal of Writing Research
  9. De La Paz S., Felton M. K. (2010). Reading and writing from multiple source documents in history: Effects of …
  10. Knowing and writing school history. The language of students’ expository writing and teac…
  11. Ericsson K. A., Simon H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215-251. https://doi…
  12. Ferrari M., Bouffard T., Rainville L. (1998). What makes a good writer? Differences in good and poor writers’…
  13. College Composition and Communication
  14. Freedman S. W., Hull G. A., Higgs J. M., Booten K. P. (2016). Teaching writing in a digital and global age: T…
  15. Galbraith D., Baaijen V. M. (2018). The work of writing: Raiding the inarticulate. Educational Psychologist, …
  16. Gillespie A., Graham S., Kiuhara S., Hebert M. (2014). High school teachers’ use of writing to support studen…
  17. Graham S., Kiuhara S. A., MacKay M. (2020). The effects of writing on learning in science, social studies, an…
  18. Graham S., Perin D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educat…
  19. Hand B., Prain V., Wallace C. (2002). Influences of writing tasks on students’ answers to recall and higher-l…
  20. Hayes J. R., Flower L. S. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1106-1113. …
  21. Hof M., Braaksma M., Rijlaarsdam G. (2015). Learning during writing: A methodology to unravel learning proces…
  22. Klein P. D. (1999). Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-to-learn. Educational Psychology Re…
  23. Journal of Writing Research
  24. 10.1017/CBO9780511571350
  25. Kuhn D., Hemberger L., Khait V. (2015). Dialogic argumentation as a bridge to argumentative thinking and writ…
  26. Ik denk / Cogito. Inleiding in de filosofie. Werkboek vwo
  27. Lenski S., Johns J. L. (1997). Patterns of reading-to-write. Reading Research and Instruction, 37(1), 15-38. …
  28. Journal of Writing Research
  29. Mateos M., Martín E., Villalón R., Luna M. (2008). Reading and writing to learn in secondary education: Onlin…
  30. Written Communication
  31. McGinley W. (1992). The role of reading and writing while composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly,…
  32. Merchie C., Van Keer H. (2014). Using on-line and off-line measures to explore fifth and sixth graders’ text-…
  33. Moje E. B., Ciechanowski K. M., Kramer K., Ellis L., Carrillo R., Collazo T. (2004). Working toward third spa…
  34. Philosophy Magazine
  35. Levende Talen Tijdschrift
  36. Nelson T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51(2), 102-116. https://doi.org/…
  37. Research in the Teaching of English
  38. 10.1598/0872071774.13
  39. Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading
  40. Handbook of educational psychology
  41. The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications
  42. Handbook of writing research
  43. Rogiers A., Merchie E., Van Keer H. (2019). What they say is what they do. Comparing task-specific self-repor…
  44. Schellings G., Aarnoutse C., Van Leeuwe J. (2006). Third-grader’s think-aloud protocols: Types of reading act…
  45. Spivey N. N., King J. R. (1989). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1)…
  46. Südkamp A., Kaiser J., Möller J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgements of students’ academic achievement: …
  47. Tozzi M. (2012). Une approche par compétences en philosophie? [A competency based approach in philosophy?]. R…
  48. Writing and cognition
  49. Van den Broek P., Helder A. (2017). Cognitive processes in discourse comprehension: Passive processes, reader…
  50. Vandevelde S., Van Keer H., Schellings G., Van Hout-Wolters B. (2015). Using think-aloud protocol analysis to…
  51. Taalgericht vakonderwijs in de mens- en maatschappijvakken. Een handreiking voor opleider…
  52. Van Drie J., Van Boxtel C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasonin…
  53. Studies in writing: Vol. 28. Writing as a learning activity
  54. Handbook of research on learning and instruction
  55. Verhavert S., Bouwer R., Donche V, De Maeyer S. (2019). A meta-analysis on the reliability of comparative jud…
  56. Wiley J., Steffens B., Britt M. A., Griffin T. D. (2014). Writing to learn from multiple source inquiry activ…
  57. Wineburg S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation …