Multimodal Language of Attitude in Digital Composition

Kathy A. Mills Australian Catholic University ; Bessie G. Stone Australian Catholic University ; Len Unsworth Australian Catholic University ; Lesley Friend Australian Catholic University

Abstract

Communication using popular digital media involves understanding multimodal systems of appraisal for expressing attitude, which traditionally deals with emotions, ethics, and aesthetics in language. The formulation and teaching of multimodal grammars for attitudinal meanings in popular texts and culture is currently underresearched. This article reports findings from multisite qualitative research that developed students’ ability to use semiotic resources for communicating attitude multimodally. The research participants were 68 students (ages 9–11 years) from two elementary schools. Students learned how to use attitudinal language—affect, judgment, and appreciation—and applied this knowledge to multimodal design. The findings advance a leading system of appraisal for discourse by adapting the system to the multimodal communication of attitude in digital comic making in schooling. The research is significant because it demonstrates the potentials for augmenting students’ linguistic and visual semiotic resources to convey multimodal attitudinal meanings in contemporary communication.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2020-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088319897978
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 29 works outside this index ↓
  1. Anderson N., Dell G. (2018). The role of consolidation in learning context-dependent phonotactic patterns in …
  2. Appadurai A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7(…
  3. 10.23860/JMLE-2018-10-03-08
  4. Teaching and learning EFL through genres
  5. 10.1016/j.linged.2009.12.005
  6. Cohn N., Murthy B., Foulsham T. (2016). Meaning above the head: Combinatorial constraints on the visual vocab…
  7. Feng D., O’Halloran K. (2012). Representing emotive meaning in visual images: A social semiotic approach. Jou…
  8. Herriott R., Firestone W. (1983). Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description and generaliz…
  9. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.001
  10. Hudson D., Walmsley J. (2005). The English patient: English grammar and teaching in the twentieth century. Jo…
  11. Jenkins E., Slemon A., Haines-Saah R., Oliffe J. (2018). A guide to multisite qualitative analysis. Qualitati…
  12. 10.1891/vivi.17.3.373.33661
  13. 10.4324/9780203619728
  14. 10.1075/pbns.242.04mac
  15. 10.1057/9780230511910
  16. 10.1007/BF03651988
    Australian Journal of Language and Literacy  
  17. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.232
  18. Mills K. A., Unsworth L. (2018). iPad animations: Powerful multimodal practices for adolescent literacy and e…
  19. Myhill D., Jones S., Watson A. (2013). Grammar matters: How teachers’ grammatical knowledge impacts on the te…
  20. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review…
  21. Paul M., Dredze M. (2011). You are what you tweet: Analyzing twitter for public health. In: Proceedings of th…
  22. Schwarz G. (2006). Expanding literacies through graphic novels. English Journal, 95(6), 58–64. https://doi.or…
  23. Sockman B., Sutton R., Herrmann M. (2016). Comic relief: Graduate students address multiple meanings for tech…
  24. 10.1016/j.dcm.2012.09.002
  25. 10.4324/9781315102665
  26. Unsworth L. (2015). Persuasive narratives: Evaluative images in picture books and animated movies. Visual Com…
  27. Versaci R. (2001). How comic books can change the way our students see literature: One teacher’s perspective.…
  28. 10.1002/9781118541821
  29. Yin R. (1981). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 58–65. https://d…
CrossRef global citation count: 22 View in citation network →