Abstract

As climate change contracts our environment, bringing human and nonhuman communities into increased contact and conflict over scarce resources, advocacy rhetoric is making a related shift, from raising human awareness of problems “out there” to renegotiating the very boundaries between human and nonhuman communities. This shift—along with the advent of online media, which similarly blurs traditional urban versus rural boundaries between communities—invites us to update classic studies of advocacy rhetoric from the 1990s and early 2000s. Accordingly, this study addresses advocates’ use of online media in the Mexican Gray Wolf Reintroduction Project. I reconstruct wildlife advocates’ attitudes toward the Project, as expressed online in press releases and blog posts, by using a combination of topology—a method that looks at patterns of topoi (shared beliefs, values, and norms) that a community expresses in a given rhetorical situation—and Kenneth Burke’s theories of attitudes and identification. I then compare advocates’ attitudes with the attitudes of project administrators and landowners in the reintroduction area, reconstructed in earlier work. I conclude that advocates amplify their identification with allies (chiefly wolves and supportive sectors of “the public”) and their alienation from competitors (chiefly public-land ranchers and project administrators) via the creation of “straw attitudes” for these communities that conflict both with their own attitude and with the documented attitudes of these communities. This rhetorical strategy creates a zero-sum political scenario for communication in the Project and recapitulates old political divisions in the southwestern United States. I finish by recommending rhetorical strategies aimed to increase identification, rather than alienation, in the Project and by showing what online advocacy rhetoric can teach us about the structure of Burkean theories of identification.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2019-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088319842566
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Written Communication

Cites in this index (6)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Written Communication
  3. College Composition and Communication
  4. Written Communication
  5. College Composition and Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 27 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1353/par.2004.0019
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  
  2. 10.1525/9780520933101
  3. 10.2111/07-063.1
  4. 10.1525/9780520340664
  5. 10.1525/9780520353237
  6. 10.1525/9780520340978
  7. Attitudes toward history: With a new afterword
  8. 10.1080/17524032.2013.822408
  9. 10.1023/B:CLIM.0000004708.74871.62
  10. 10.4324/9780203063088
  11. 10.1007/978-3-319-51268-6_6
  12. Reframing the problem of climate change: From zero sum game to win-win solutions
  13. 10.1177/0957926502013003054
  14. 10.1007/978-3-319-51268-6_7
  15. 10.4159/9780674039964
  16. 10.1080/00335638009383499
  17. 10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
  18. 10.5325/jinfopoli.2.2012.0001
  19. Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature
  20. 10.1002/wsb.251
  21. 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00099.x
  22. 10.1080/17524032.2015.1018837
  23. 10.1080/02560046.2013.867587
    Critical Arts  
  24. Environmental justice and environmentalism: The social justice challenge to the environme…
  25. 10.22230/cjc.1991v16n3a626
  26. Topologies as techniques for a post-critical rhetoric
  27. 10.1177/1075547014566990
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →